Quote from: Umulala-alala on Today at 04:29:48 PM

Quote from: Muba20 on Today at 04:53:25 AM

Quote from: Nightwatchmare on July 21, 2025, 04:37:14 PM

Quote from: sotelorene on July 18, 2025, 04:47:07 PM

Yes, I totally agree with you agreessive investment should not be done often because there is every possibility that you will run out of funds and once an Investor run out of funds it is going to be a very big problem. The only thing that should be carry out or done regularly or often is our DCA method while agreessive investment should be done once in awhile when we have saved up something big that will help us take advantage of the market. Anyone investor who doesn't understand this word investing agreessive might exceed their limit and one thing about investment is that once you exceed what you are suppose to..., you will see the consequences but a good investor can reduce the consequences by taking necessary actions.

Since we are using discretionary income to accumulate bitcoin, there's no problem if an investor decides to invest aggressively in bitcoin all the time because he is using the money that is not meant for his expenses to invest in bitcoin, and he can use his discretionary income the way that pleases him. Investing aggressively in bitcoin has been discussed so many times on this thread and on the buy the dip and hodl thread, but it seems a lot of members are still misunderstanding the concept of investing aggressively in bitcoin. Investing aggressively in Bitcoin isn't only when you use $200 or $500 to accumulate Bitcoin; as far as you are consistent in accumulating Bitcoin weekly or monthly with $5, you are investing aggressively in Bitcoin because that is your level of aggressiveness, and you aren't also overdoing it.

Many people don't understand aggressive investing. They may think that pouring in more money means aggressive investing, which in reality is not the case. But the reality is that an investor can be aggressive by controlling his risk, that means, if he invests all his discretionary income, it is an aggressive investment, but it is not risky. As a result, the investor will be able to grow his Bitcoin portfolio. There are some investors who wait for the dip as a strategy. If they do not do that, but use their discretionary income money regularly over the long term, then he will be able to build a good portfolio. If the investor invests more than he can afford, it will certainly be acceptable ‍and he will definitely be able to acquire a large portfolio of Bitcoin in the future.

I think you are wrong here when an investor invests with more than he can afford to loss what he is doing is gambling because this will make him sell his bitcoin too soon because he was investing with the wrong method, bitcoin investment should should come from our discretionary income which is also what we can afford to loss. Buying with more than what we can afford to loss is over aggressiveness since you are investing outside your discretionary income thinking this will make you acquire a large bitcoin portfolio believe such investor will sell too soon when are not supposed to sell because they uses the wrong method in buying bitcoin.

I agree with you, investing what one can not afford to let go is more like a trader thing and it is a wrong investment entirely because an investor should always ensure to invest what they can afford to let go and funny enough this what they can afford to let go doesn't mean it is a small amount of money rather it is a considerable amount that looks encouraging. Investing what you can not afford to let go already means planning to sell very early because when the market go against your wish and you are not financially buoyant you will have no option than to sell because you have used the money you would have use to take care of that need that arise.