Quote from: Fiatless on Today at 05:43:54 PM

Quote from: Adbitco on Today at 01:55:22 PM

£80 million? Isn't this supposed to be annoying, like what's this, even teams like PSG, Manchester City and Newcastle who are owned by Arab billionaires will never pay such a fee for a player like Jackson infact eve the Saudi clubs can't even think of this knowing fully well they have the money to throw around. It's now looking like Chelsea are now having Manchester United and Arsenal as dumping ground for their failed players. It will be the biggest joke if Manchester United happens to buy Jackson let alone paying this abnormal fee for a Jackson kind of player.

Ten goals and five assists in thirty games is a fair result for a striker. The challenge was that the club expected much from him but he failed to live up to expectations. Chelsea failed to sign natural number nine because Enzo Maresca thought the Senegal international would score more goals. My only problem with Jackson was the way he handled criticism. He went to the extent of disrespecting Chelsea legend Mikel Obi because the former midfielder criticised him.

I don't even even understand what you're saying right now, 10 goals is ok for a top 9 in a full league season? Can you even listen to yourself? I'm not all about the assists because that's not his main job, his job is to convert chances into goals which he doesn't. It would have been understandable if Chelsea didn't have midfielder to create chances for the attack. After playing 30 plus matches and you say it's ok for scoring 10 goals for someone that his job is to score goals.