Hi @BitcoinGirl.Club, I mentioned it was similar to card counting, but in terms of using observation and timing, not exploiting hidden flaws in the system. Do correct me if I'm wrong, card counting is not illegal, but it was frowned upon by the casinos (sometimes getting paid then kicked out, depends on where you are). It requires mental calculation, tracking, and efforts to be put into it to be effective.
In my case, my bets were based entirely on publicly visible, real-time Binance BTC/USDT prices displayed directly in the game. There’s no mental calculation, bug, or secret knowledge, it is just reacting to a live market pattern (I did mention my strategy in this thread, so you can refer to that).
Simply, I played the game as designed. If simply winning too much is treated as proof of cheating, then every successful player is at risk, because that undermines trust in any platform.
Edit:
If the provider don't accept your winning then I don't think the casino will help you.
I understand your point, but I have to ask respectfully, if a casino offers a game that’s vulnerable to legitimate strategies, is it fair to blame the player for using those strategies?
If the provider “doesn’t accept the winning” after the fact, even though the game worked as designed at the time, then where does player protection stand? At what point does it become the casino’s responsibility to offer a secure and fair game before accepting real money bets?