Oh gawd you are a dweeb.     You don't even know how to place something that is an attempt at quasi-relevance, showing your pettiness and lack of focus.  I am not going to help your filled-with-fantasies retarded ass.      




hahahahaha

A self-deprecating (mutilating) one.

Do you subscribe to a "cutting" way of life?

 


Those are reasonably important points, and when those points are coupled with the fact that there has never been any clarity regarding the whole of ETH's supply and not even any way to currently pinpoint the supply, which contributes to a horey sheit level of inside shenanigans in regards to the ability to close to unlimitedly continue to issue more supply on the backs of whoever might not be a direct beneficiary of such behind the scenes printing.


None of the shitcoins even come close to bitcoin, and the verification that no extra supply can be issued remains important, even and in spite of a decently high likelihood that there are a lot of third-parties who are also engaging in practices in which they do not have close to enough coins to cover all of their obligations, which is likely to get them into trouble sooner or later when they are playing with such fire and if the public (market) starts to suss out that they do not have even close to the quantity of the coins that they claim to have... . .so then a question comes in regards to if there is going to be anyone who is ready to step up to the plate and to be able to bail out their sorry and pathetic asses that tried to get away with overly fractional reserving their bitcoin.


Historically, USDT has been the least corrupt of the "stable" coins.. .so you seem to be buying into propaganda... and yeah, governments and other BIG players getting into bitcoin  is likely to pump our bags, but they are not facilitating the thing that gives power to bitcoin, which is the ability to hold BTC privately and to transact privately, so if you consider bitcoin's value proposition to be based on our bags being pumped by institutions, then you seem vulnerable towards getting wrapped up in number go up instead of really trying to make sure that you (and anyone you know) try to at least protect themselves in terms of their own actions to make sure that they are holding decent quantities of their own coins.. and yeah sure, there is no problem that some guys might choose to not hold their own coins in their first 6 to 18 months of being involved in bitcoin, yet sooner or later normies likely need to spend time to attempt to make sure that they are protecting themselves and their coins through the employment self-custodial practices for a decent quantity of their BTC stash..


You are on the right track.  You go girl!!!!


Of course, "we" are always serious in these here parts.

By the way, you seem to already recognize dangers offor newbies like you getting involved in topics that may or may not be joking about meta issues or maybe even tothertopics that touch upon other historical forum issues that would have had presumptively happened prior to your arriving to these here parts.

It seems that when you are new, you are likely better off to try to stay topical to bitcoin while we are getting to know you, and frequently it will take a bit of time to get used to interacting with forum members who might not even be very friendly to newbies like you jumping into the frey of matters that might be tied with personalities and/or history.

Oh gawd you are a dweeb.    You don't even know how to place something that is an attempt at quasi-relevance, showing your pettiness and lack of focus.  I am not going to help your filled-with-fantasies retarded ass.     




hahahahaha

A self-deprecating (mutilating) one.

Do you subscribe to a "cutting" way of life?

 


Those are reasonably important points, and when those points are coupled with the fact that there has never been any clarity regarding the whole of ETH's supply and not even any way to currently pinpoint the supply, which contributes to a horey sheit level of inside shenanigans in regards to the ability to close to unlimitedly continue to issue more supply on the backs of whoever might not be a direct beneficiary of such behind the scenes printing.


None of the shitcoins even come close to bitcoin, and the verification that no extra supply can be issued remains important, even and in spite of a decently high likelihood that there are a lot of third-parties who are also engaging in practices in which they do not have close to enough coins to cover all of their obligations, which is likely to get them into trouble sooner or later when they are playing with such fire and if the public (market) starts to suss out that they do not have even close to the quantity of the coins that they claim to have... . .so then a question comes in regards to if there is going to be anyone who is ready to step up to the plate and to be able to bail out their sorry and pathetic asses that tried to get away with overly fractional reserving their bitcoin.


Historically, USDT has been the least corrupt of the "stable" coins.. .so you seem to be buying into propaganda... and yeah, governments and other BIG players getting into bitcoin  is likely to pump our bags, but they are not facilitating the thing that gives power to bitcoin, which is the ability to hold BTC privately and to transact privately, so if you consider bitcoin's value proposition to be based on our bags being pumped by institutions, then you seem vulnerable towards getting wrapped up in number go up instead of really trying to make sure that you (and anyone you know) try to at least protect themselves in terms of their own actions to make sure that they are holding decent quantities of their own coins.. and yeah sure, there is no problem that some guys might choose to not hold their own coins in their first 6 to 18 months of being involved in bitcoin, yet sooner or later normies likely need to spend time to attempt to make sure that they are protecting themselves and their coins through the employment self-custodial practices for a decent quantity of their BTC stash..


You are on the right track.  You go girl!!!!


Of course, "we" are always serious in these here parts.

By the way, you seem to already recognize dangers of newbies like you getting involved in topics that may or may not be joking about meta issues or maybe even tother historical forum issues.

It seems that when you are new, you are likely better off to try to stay topical to bitcoin while we are getting to know you, and frequently it will take a bit of time to get used to interacting with members who might not even be very friendly to newbies jumping into the frey.