Next scheduled rescrape ... never
05/08/2025, 04:39:02 UTC POST DELETED
Original archived Re: In the field of bitcoin
Scraped on 29/07/2025, 04:39:31 UTC
In our field if you can make long term predictions then you wouldn't call it volatile really, because you can predict what it is going to do exactly from a couple to a year up front sometimes even years up front. It only looks volatile to people who aren't sure what they are doing. (Yes technically by literal definition it is and has been but who cares about technicalities). You could entirely very safely predict that when regulations dog whistles would go through BTC will go into chaos while ETH would draw power from it just because why they are both used. (BTC would only stand if they make it something more).

The provided statement argues that while cryptocurrency markets like BTC and ETH may appear volatile, this perception stems from a lack of understanding. For those with expertise, long-term predictions (from months to years) are possible due to the predictable nature of their underlying uses and responses to events like regulations. The author suggests BTC's instability during regulatory changes, contrasting it with ETH's potential to gain traction, implying a predictable shift based on their fundamental designs, unless BTC's utility evolves.