Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Edited on 06/08/2025, 18:35:05 UTC
Quote
You are indeed trying to reason coherently, but you are a leftist who has read communist propaganda and is spreading anti-Western and pro-terrorist propaganda.
No I'm not pro-NATO since last I checked the only organization that armed terrorists was NATO...
Or you haven't read the Timber Sycamore files or listen to Tulsi Gabbard, ie the United States Director of National Intelligence who literally confessed that it was US regime that armed al-Qaeda!
good move, and funny. you are making NATO look like terrorists, although NATO only intervenes in the situation in specific places. NATO as a whole is cowardly and useless.
At the same time, you support Arab terrorists created with the participation of the USSR and China and sincerely believe in the genocide in Gaza, preferring to ignore the mass murders in other countries.

Both, multipolar and unipolar words have their pros and cons but I feel like unipolar will be the winner in the end. Globalism is inevitable to my mind because English is one of the easiest language (at least for me) to learn, it's widely spoken outside of China
Globalism is another "ism" that is dead. It is not possible to have it in the way the West wanted (a cloning factory where no culture exists except the filthy thing West wants and everyone thinks and acts the same way). That may work in places where there was no culture or civilization to begin with like EU or US itself, but when they move eastward and start facing ancient civilizations like Iran, China or even Egypt they stop right there.

The part about interdependence is another matter and it will happen naturally and it can happen in a multi-polar world were multiple "power blocs" exist and deal with each other. Using English to communicate doesn't change that.
which underlines my correct conclusions that you are a hater of the West.

your appeal to ancient civilizations is also half true and half manipulative. Ancient Egypt and Iran are no more, their ancient culture was lost after the conquest of the countries by Islam. Coptic and Pahlavi are dead (the languages of ancient Egypt and Persia)
Besides, you have exposed yourself as an opponent of globalization. All the nations and tribes of the world are gradually uniting.
Only those countries that want to preserve their neighbors in a situation of hostility are anti-globalists.
For example, Iran is trying to prevent Saudi Arabia and Israel from getting closer.

and everyone thinks and acts the same way
You are confusing it with communism. However, I understand that this resonates with you more.

ps.
That may work in places where there was no culture or civilization to begin with like EU or US
As for your statement where you say that the EU never had culture and civilization... well, you have once again revealed yourself as a rabid hater of the West and even a racist.
Hmm, I didn't think I'd find such furiously angry and embittered people in the English-language threads.

ps2. if you are really Iranian, I can tell you a lot about Iran.. if you want it of course )))
Version 1
Edited on 30/07/2025, 19:04:54 UTC
Quote
You are indeed trying to reason coherently, but you are a leftist who has read communist propaganda and is spreading anti-Western and pro-terrorist propaganda.
No I'm not pro-NATO since last I checked the only organization that armed terrorists was NATO...
Or you haven't read the Timber Sycamore files or listen to Tulsi Gabbard, ie the United States Director of National Intelligence who literally confessed that it was US regime that armed al-Qaeda!
good move, and funny. you are making NATO look like terrorists, although NATO only intervenes in the situation in specific places. NATO as a whole is cowardly and useless.
At the same time, you support Arab terrorists created with the participation of the USSR and China and sincerely believe in the genocide in Gaza, preferring to ignore the mass murders in other countries.
Such a hypocritical and narrow-minded person really deserves to be in BRICS.

Both, multipolar and unipolar words have their pros and cons but I feel like unipolar will be the winner in the end. Globalism is inevitable to my mind because English is one of the easiest language (at least for me) to learn, it's widely spoken outside of China
Globalism is another "ism" that is dead. It is not possible to have it in the way the West wanted (a cloning factory where no culture exists except the filthy thing West wants and everyone thinks and acts the same way). That may work in places where there was no culture or civilization to begin with like EU or US itself, but when they move eastward and start facing ancient civilizations like Iran, China or even Egypt they stop right there.

The part about interdependence is another matter and it will happen naturally and it can happen in a multi-polar world were multiple "power blocs" exist and deal with each other. Using English to communicate doesn't change that.
which underlines my correct conclusions that you are a communist hater of the West.

your appeal to ancient civilizations is also half true and half manipulative. Ancient Egypt and Iran are no more, their ancient culture was lost after the conquest of the countries by Islam. Coptic and Pahlavi are dead (the languages of ancient Egypt and Persia)
Besides, you have exposed yourself as an opponent of globalization. All the nations and tribes of the world are gradually uniting.
Only those countries that want to preserve their neighbors in a situation of hostility are anti-globalists.
For example, Iran is trying to prevent Saudi Arabia and Israel from getting closer.

and everyone thinks and acts the same way
You are confusing it with communism. However, I understand that this resonates with you more.
Original archived Re: 11 more countries just joined BRICS this week
Scraped on 30/07/2025, 18:35:20 UTC
Quote
You are indeed trying to reason coherently, but you are a leftist who has read communist propaganda and is spreading anti-Western and pro-terrorist propaganda.
No I'm not pro-NATO since last I checked the only organization that armed terrorists was NATO...
Or you haven't read the Timber Sycamore files or listen to Tulsi Gabbard, ie the United States Director of National Intelligence who literally confessed that it was US regime that armed al-Qaeda!
good move, and funny. you are making NATO look like terrorists, although NATO only intervenes in the situation in specific places. NATO as a whole is cowardly and useless.
At the same time, you support Arab terrorists created with the participation of the USSR and China and sincerely believe in the genocide in Gaza, preferring to ignore the mass murders in other countries.
Such a hypocritical and narrow-minded person really deserves to be in BRICS.

Both, multipolar and unipolar words have their pros and cons but I feel like unipolar will be the winner in the end. Globalism is inevitable to my mind because English is one of the easiest language (at least for me) to learn, it's widely spoken outside of China
Globalism is another "ism" that is dead. It is not possible to have it in the way the West wanted (a cloning factory where no culture exists except the filthy thing West wants and everyone thinks and acts the same way). That may work in places where there was no culture or civilization to begin with like EU or US itself, but when they move eastward and start facing ancient civilizations like Iran, China or even Egypt they stop right there.

The part about interdependence is another matter and it will happen naturally and it can happen in a multi-polar world were multiple "power blocs" exist and deal with each other. Using English to communicate doesn't change that.
which underlines my correct conclusions that you are a communist hater of the West.

your appeal to ancient civilizations is also half true and half manipulative. Ancient Egypt and Iran are no more, their ancient culture was lost after the conquest of the countries by Islam. Coptic and Pahlavi are dead (the languages of ancient Egypt and Persia)
Besides, you have exposed yourself as an opponent of globalization. All the nations and tribes of the world are gradually uniting.
Only those countries that want to preserve their neighbors in a situation of hostility are anti-globalists.
For example, Iran is trying to prevent Saudi Arabia and Israel from getting closer.