in the US (if you mean the US or Europe) people do not conduct destructive propaganda against their political opponents, by labeling the USA as a terrorist country.
I also visit the "politics" section very rarely.
But I am sure that it is better to tell the truth than to remain silent, fearing to anger the opponent. Excessive tolerance leads to conformism.

This is a very important issue, and I’m glad you brought it up.
There is a big difference between expressing an opinion and engaging in deliberate, systematic propaganda.
pooya87 is doing exactly that — engaging in propaganda and brainwashing. His goal is to influence the minds of Western people by convincing them that Western countries are terrorist states.

I’m originally from the USSR and Russia, and I know very well how propaganda works — and more importantly, why it works. (My former country has been recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism by the EU.)
I recently moved to Europe, and I do not want to see terrorism apologists convincing Western people that their countries are the bad guys.

This is especially strange coming from someone from Iran — a country that itself sponsors terrorism.

And of course I won't remove my tag about him! This is not a subject of bargaining for me!!! A negative tag about me won't be able to convince me to remove a negative trust from an anti-Western propagandist!

I will not remove a negative review even if I get -100 to my trust. I will not remove it even under the threat of being blocked on the forum.

I believe that pooya87 had the right to leave a negative tag about me, and I have absolutely no objection to that.
However, I object to his wording and the defamation — the claim that I “whitewash” Al-Qaeda and ISIS is a lie.
My posts were focused on criticizing and mocking pooya87 himself, as well as criticizing anti-Western propaganda. I also pointed out where that propaganda originated and who funded it in the first place.

Now I’m surprised at how infantile Westerners seem — that they are willing to tolerate, or even justify, the presence of someone who is clearly an anti-Western propagandist.

(Yes, I may come across as rude or harsh. My words may sound emotional — but this is not emotion, it’s simply a way of expressing my thoughts to emphasize key points.)

The essence of my negative feedback about pooya87 is to show the community that this user is a systematic promoter of anti-Western narratives, and the purpose of that propaganda is to undermine the cohesion of Western society.

Let me repeat: this is not about lowering someone’s trust just “for political views.”
The issue is that the user is engaged in deliberate anti-Western propaganda, targeting the minds of anyone who understands English or can use a translator.

No  , I do not want that! I do not want the negative feedback about me to be deleted!
Moreover, I strongly oppose the idea that mutual negative feedback should be used as a method of pressure or a system of bargaining and manipulation.
Is that really how you want the trust system to function?

I left a well-reasoned and truthful feedback about pooya87.
Let pooya87 leave his own feedback about me — but he should remove the slander and lies.

In fact, pooya87’s false accusations clearly reveal his true nature: lies and manipulation.
That’s exactly why I took a screenshot

that's why in my review I provided a link and gave reasons
As I already explained above, I will not delete my feedback, and I do not consider this a matter of bargaining.
In fact, I believe pooya87’s negative tag about me is fair in form, but not in content.
He and his like-minded supporters can downvote me as much as they like — that won’t affect how I feel.
But I am outraged by the lies and slander.
Is that now a norm on this forum?
I hope not.

Please provide actual quotes of these so-called “dumpster fire of deranged insults and posts seemingly written with the help of AI”
please kindly feel free to quote my posts
There was indeed one insulting remark from my side — I acknowledge that.
But the rest of my messages were reasoned, though mocking in tone.

Moreover, in the thread mentioned in the first post, I presented many arguments against Iran and Iranian propaganda.
My messages were written in Russian and translated using ChatGPT, because Google Translate is not reliable enough.
So your claim about the content or tone of my messages is simply not true.

Anyone can follow the link and read my messages themselves:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.0
Your lies and slander have failed.

As I’ve already stated above (including in my very first message), I am not opposed to receiving a negative tag, and I am not asking for it to be removed.
But I am drawing the community’s attention to the defamation written about me by the so-called “respected” pooya87 — so respected, in fact, that you seem willing to turn a blind eye to lies, and to normalize falsehoods and slander.

I came here not only to draw attention to a propagandist, but also to a liar and slanderer.
This topic wouldn’t even exist if pooya87 had just called me an idiot, a jerk, or anything else like that.
But instead, he chose to write lies and slander.

By the way, if you share his views — that says a lot about you.
Apparently, for you it's acceptable to write lies and defamation.

No, I will not delete it. This is not a matter of bargaining.
However, I have never accused pooya87 of anything I cannot prove.
Meanwhile, pooya87 accused me of supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS — and that is a lie.

What benefit did I get, other than general hate?
My goal is to warn the community that this user is quite skilled at deliberate propaganda.
As revenge, pooya87 slandered me, accusing me of supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

In doing so, he essentially exposed himself False accusations say a lot about a person.
Or is this becoming the norm now? So I can just write that he killed Santa Claus — and that won’t cause outrage or concern?

No, he did not delete his feedback.
Moreover, I took a screenshot specifically to prevent him from silently removing his lie.
He has absolutely no way to prove that I supported Al-Qaeda or ISIS.

in the US (if you mean the US or Europe) people do not conduct destructive propaganda against their political opponents.
I also visit the "politics" section very rarely.
But I am sure that it is better to tell the truth than to remain silent, fearing to anger the opponent. Excessive tolerance leads to conformism.

This is a very important issue, and I’m glad you brought it up.
There is a big difference between expressing an opinion and engaging in deliberate, systematic propaganda.
pooya87 is doing exactly that — engaging in propaganda and brainwashing. His goal is to influence the minds of Western people by convincing them that Western countries are terrorist states.

I’m originally from the USSR and Russia, and I know very well how propaganda works — and more importantly, why it works. (My former country has been recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism by the EU.)
I recently moved to Europe, and I do not want to see terrorism apologists convincing Western people that their countries are the bad guys.

This is especially strange coming from someone from Iran — a country that itself sponsors terrorism.

And of course I won't remove my tag about him! This is not a subject of bargaining for me!!! A negative tag about me won't be able to convince me to remove a negative trust from an anti-Western propagandist!

I will not remove a negative review even if I get -100 to my trust. I will not remove it even under the threat of being blocked on the forum.

I believe that pooya87 had the right to leave a negative tag about me, and I have absolutely no objection to that.
However, I object to his wording and the defamation — the claim that I “whitewash” Al-Qaeda and ISIS is a lie.
My posts were focused on criticizing and mocking pooya87 himself, as well as criticizing anti-Western propaganda. I also pointed out where that propaganda originated and who funded it in the first place.

Now I’m surprised at how infantile Westerners seem — that they are willing to tolerate, or even justify, the presence of someone who is clearly an anti-Western propagandist.

(Yes, I may come across as rude or harsh. My words may sound emotional — but this is not emotion, it’s simply a way of expressing my thoughts to emphasize key points.)

The essence of my negative feedback about pooya87 is to show the community that this user is a systematic promoter of anti-Western narratives, and the purpose of that propaganda is to undermine the cohesion of Western society.

Let me repeat: this is not about lowering someone’s trust just “for political views.”
The issue is that the user is engaged in deliberate anti-Western propaganda, targeting the minds of anyone who understands English or can use a translator.

No  , I do not want that! I do not want the negative feedback about me to be deleted!
Moreover, I strongly oppose the idea that mutual negative feedback should be used as a method of pressure or a system of bargaining and manipulation.
Is that really how you want the trust system to function?

I left a well-reasoned and truthful feedback about pooya87.
Let pooya87 leave his own feedback about me — but he should remove the slander and lies.

In fact, pooya87’s false accusations clearly reveal his true nature: lies and manipulation.
That’s exactly why I took a screenshot

that's why in my review I provided a link and gave reasons
As I already explained above, I will not delete my feedback, and I do not consider this a matter of bargaining.
In fact, I believe pooya87’s negative tag about me is fair in form, but not in content.
He and his like-minded supporters can downvote me as much as they like — that won’t affect how I feel.
But I am outraged by the lies and slander.
Is that now a norm on this forum?
I hope not.

Please provide actual quotes of these so-called “dumpster fire of deranged insults and posts seemingly written with the help of AI”
please kindly feel free to quote my posts
There was indeed one insulting remark from my side — I acknowledge that.
But the rest of my messages were reasoned, though mocking in tone.

Moreover, in the thread mentioned in the first post, I presented many arguments against Iran and Iranian propaganda.
My messages were written in Russian and translated using ChatGPT, because Google Translate is not reliable enough.
So your claim about the content or tone of my messages is simply not true.

Anyone can follow the link and read my messages themselves:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5551741.0
Your lies and slander have failed.

As I’ve already stated above (including in my very first message), I am not opposed to receiving a negative tag, and I am not asking for it to be removed.
But I am drawing the community’s attention to the defamation written about me by the so-called “respected” pooya87 — so respected, in fact, that you seem willing to turn a blind eye to lies, and to normalize falsehoods and slander.

I came here not only to draw attention to a propagandist, but also to a liar and slanderer.
This topic wouldn’t even exist if pooya87 had just called me an idiot, a jerk, or anything else like that.
But instead, he chose to write lies and slander.

By the way, if you share his views — that says a lot about you.
Apparently, for you it's acceptable to write lies and defamation.

No, I will not delete it. This is not a matter of bargaining.
However, I have never accused pooya87 of anything I cannot prove.
Meanwhile, pooya87 accused me of supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS — and that is a lie.

What benefit did I get, other than general hate?
My goal is to warn the community that this user is quite skilled at deliberate propaganda.
As revenge, pooya87 slandered me, accusing me of supporting Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

In doing so, he essentially exposed himself False accusations say a lot about a person.
Or is this becoming the norm now? So I can just write that he killed Santa Claus — and that won’t cause outrage or concern?

No, he did not delete his feedback.
Moreover, I took a screenshot specifically to prevent him from silently removing his lie.
He has absolutely no way to prove that I supported Al-Qaeda or ISIS.