Yep.. .I consider my projection to be an attempt to figure out what is the most likely base case, and surely my projection has a built in assumption of BTC prices having some decent amount of upward tear that contributes to the 200-WMA moving up faster than its current rate of moving up, and for sure, my projection might not end up playing out, even though I consider it to be a base case, and even if the crossing over of the $69k ends up happening a month or two sooner or a few months later, it does not hurt to attempt to project it out, and surely I don't proclaim to be any kind of future sorcerer, but instead trying to assign values based on what I consider scenarios that have the higher chances of playing out... which yeah, if we add up all of the scenarios maybe my base case might still only end up having 30% to 40% odds, even though I still consider my base case to be the more likely of scenarios within my own opinion frame-work (for whatever that is worth), given the various alternative scenarios that would be contending to within the realm of possibilities to play out.


There may we ways that the contents of the table will show if some of the data is removed (like removing 5 years at a time until it finally shows up?)..   I will not try to make any changes on my end, and I will leave it to you to figure out, for now..


O.k.  Sure.  See what you can do to be able to publish the whole thing.. otherwise, if it does not cover so many dates, that might work too.. such as cutting 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 years off of the end of it.


To me, it sounds like a wee bit of an arrogant "over promise and under deliver" in regards to some kind of a phenomena that is not within the ability of anyone, including Saylor to deliver... and so yeah the continuation of the 4-year cycles (or some close variant of it) seems the more probable scenario, which likely ongoingly includes goth ups and downs... whether we refer to the downs as winters or we come up with some other clever name to label them as if they were a "new" phenomena when it it merely whine delivered in a different style of a flask.


That is another way of saying that ongoing cycles seem more likely, at least for the time being, even if there might be some periods in which BTC price dynamics might seem to be deviating from its historical cycle patterns.

Yep.. .I consider my projection to be an attempt to figure out what is the most likely base case, and surely my projection has a built in assumption of BTC prices having some decent amount of upward tear that contributes to the 200-WMA moving up faster than its current rate of moving up, and for sure, my projection might not end up playing out, even though I consider it to be a base case, and even if the crossing over of the $69k ends up happening a month or two sooner or a few months later, it does not hurt to attempt to project it out, and surely I don't proclaim to be any kind of future sorcerer, but instead trying to assign values based on what I consider scenarios that have the higher chances of playing out... which yeah, if we add up all of the scenarios maybe my base case might still only end up having 30% to 40% odds, even though I still consider my base case to be the more likely of scenarios within my own opinion frame-work (for whatever that is worth), given the various alternative scenarios that would be contending to within the realm of possibilities to play out.


There may we ways that the contents of the table will show if some of the data is removed (like removing 5 years at a time until it finally shows up?)..    I will not try to make any changes on my end, and I will leave it to you to figure out, for now..


O.k.  Sure.  See what you can do to be able to publish the whole thing.. otherwise, if it does not cover so many dates, that might work too.. such as cutting 5, 10, 20, 30, 50 years off of the end of it.


To me, it sounds like a wee bit of an arrogant "over promise, and under deliver" in regards to some kind of somethinga phenomena that is not within anyone'sthe ability of anyone, including Saylor to deliver... and so yeah the continuation of the 4-year cycles (or some close variant of it) seems the more probable scenario, which likely ongoingly includes goth ups and downs... whether we refer to the downs as winters or we come up with some other clever name to label them as if they were a "new" phenomena when it it merely whine delivered in a different style of a flask.


That is another way of saying that ongoing cycles seem more likely, at least for the time being, even if there might be some periods in which BTC price dynamics might seem to be deviating from its historical cycle patterns.