Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 10/08/2025, 20:47:24 UTC
Bump for holy. This whole thing is wrong and very misleading. I ‘ll post more if you want.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
And which part is the misinformation? To protect BetFury? That data you quoted, of which I spent hours to consolidate and crosscheck, simply shows facts of what game ended up in loses and what game ended in winnings. So which part from the quoted message that is a misinformation?
Or on more posts, as you hinted?
Your numbers are wrong and it shows why you take so much time. Doing it your way makes it about $400,000.
Here's the difference between our conversations with books. Because you put out in the open that I communicated with XYes, I'll post this.
1. I ask XYes why they aren't paying.
2. They tell me the players bets are a certain percentage off the closing line.
3. I say that while they are +EV, they aren't bad lines. I say that all governing bodies are going to rule for the player. Then I say other books pay then limit.
4. XYes says they aren't paying.
5. I say I don't think we are going to see eye to eye.
6. XYes agrees and the conversation is ended.
7. I tell the player that XYes said they aren't paying and the only chance is forum pressure in ANN thread and scam accusations.
Your way and how I perceive it. Tell me if I'm wrong.
1. You contact XYes and tell us that it will take a few days to discuss this with XYes.
2. You get some information and tell the forum it's for your eyes only. The info is just a flag which means nothing. It's to profile.
3. It takes a few days and you say after looking at the for your eyes only information, that XYes is right in confiscating the money.
You do a lot of good for the forum and get posters paid. You should be praised for this. I just think you should take poster input, not mine, more seriously because of the mistakes. Books will give you bad information. They make you take your eye off the ball. Both your decisions with Betfury are way off and easy cases. Ahoy is right on the money.
Version 1
Scraped on 03/08/2025, 20:52:15 UTC
Bump for holy. This whole thing is wrong and very misleading. I ‘ll post more if you want.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
And which part is the misinformation? To protect BetFury? That data you quoted, of which I spent hours to consolidate and crosscheck, simply shows facts of what game ended up in loses and what game ended in winnings. So which part from the quoted message that is a misinformation?
Or on more posts, as you hinted?
Your numbers are wrong and it shows why you take so much time. Doing it your way makes it about $400,000.
Here's the difference between our conversations with books. Because you put out in the open that I communicated with XYes, I'll post this.
1. I ask XYes why they aren't paying.
2. They tell me the players bets are a certain percentage off the closing line.
3. I say that while they are +EV, they aren't bad lines. I say that all governing bodies are going to rule for the player. Then I say other books pay then limit.
4. XYes says they aren't paying.
5. I say I don't think we are going to see eye to eye.
6. XYes agrees and the conversation is ended.
7. I tell the player that XYes said they aren't paying and the only chance is forum pressure in ANN thread and scam accusations.
Your way and how I perceive it. Tell me if I'm wrong.
1. You contact XYes and tell us that it will take a few days to discuss this with XYes.
2. You get some information and tell the forum it's for your eyes only. The info is just a flag which means nothing. It's to profile.
3. It takes a few days and you say after looking at the for your eyes only information, that XYes is right in confiscating the money.
You do a lot of good for the forum and get posters paid. You should be praised for this. I just think you should take poster input, not mine, more seriously because of the mistakes. Books will give you bad information. They make you take your eye off the ball. Both your decisions with Betfury are way off and easy cases. Ahoy is right on the money.
Original archived Re: Betfury cancelled $300,000 worth of bets
Scraped on 03/08/2025, 20:47:40 UTC
Bump for holy. This whole thing is wrong and very misleading. I ‘ll post more if you want.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
On another note, there is very little to discuss with this case. Bet Fury didn’t pay the winning tickets because the player was considered high risk. They also think they can cancel bets gone final. Let’s not make this complicated.
Show me one case where it takes more than 10 minutes to determine if a bet should be paid because a player is considered high risk.
And which part is the misinformation? To protect BetFury? That data you quoted, of which I spent hours to consolidate and crosscheck, simply shows facts of what game ended up in loses and what game ended in winnings. So which part from the quoted message that is a misinformation?
Or on more posts, as you hinted?
Your numbers are wrong and it shows why you take so much time. Doing it your way makes it about $400,000.
Here's the difference between our conversations with books. Because you put out in the open that I communicated with XYes, I'll post this.
1. I ask XYes why they aren't paying.
2. They tell me the players bets are a certain percentage off the closing line.
3. I say that while they are +EV, they aren't bad lines. I say that all governing bodies are going to rule for the player. Then I say other books pay then limit.
4. XYes says they aren't paying.
5. I say I don't think we are going to see eye to eye.
6. XYes agrees and the conversation is ended.
7. I tell the player that XYes said they aren't paying and the only chance is forum pressure in ANN thread and scam accusations.
Your way and how I perceive it. Tell me if I'm wrong.
1. You contact XYes and tell us that it will take a few days to discuss this with XYes.
2. You get some information and tell the forum it's for your eyes only. The info is just a flag which means nothing. It's to profile.
3. It takes a few days and you say after looking at the for your eyes only information, that XYes is right in confiscating the money.
You do a lot of good for the forum and get posters paid. You should be praised for this. I just think you should take poster input, not mine, more seriously because of the mistakes. Books will give you bad information. Both your decisions with Betfury are way off and easy cases. Ahoy is right on the money.