Quote from: tvbcof on May 06, 2014, 02:18:00 AM

Quote from: AnonyMint on May 06, 2014, 01:58:06 AM

It is an emergent theory of gravity, meaning the entropy (degrees-of-freedom) is the fundamental. Thus 'equivalent' is a superset of 'related to'.

You fucking dolt. How much more of my time are you going to waste!

Fuck!

From wikipedia about 'entropic gravity':

Quote

Since it does not make new physical predictions, it can not be falsified with existing experimental methods ...

I'll translate that for the layman:

It's completely useless for anything but trying to either trying impress people like you (laymen) or on rare occasion to have mental circle-jerk with your like-minded friends.

Certainly it is utterly useless for anything remotely related to Bundy, the 2nd, economics, or pretty much anything else under the sun.

Scientists don't cite Wikipedia as a canonical reference and for very good reason, because it is a manipulated resource.

Your lazy arse will need to expend more time learning (as I suggested you do in my prior post) if you hope to understand.

Remember Einstein was ignored (and maligned in some circles) for some time before his theories were recognized to be widely predictive and fundamental.

If you dig, you will learn that this is a fundamental breakthrough with wide ranging implications on unifying quantum mechanics and relativity. As with most new theories, there is some debate and contention. I've refuted one of the primary antagonists (who seems to get along in public about as well as you do).