Quote from: passwordnow on August 05, 2025, 09:22:42 AM

Quote from: XworldsmineN on August 05, 2025, 07:02:18 AM

WE already know that if you've created the so called "next bitcoin" you do not have to market it as such. It has to have a legit use case, as well as mass adaptability.

People and real investors are already tired of this BS. The next BTC as they always label it will no longer be liked by the community. Even adding bitcoin at its name will never do anything differently. So, for those developers that have made such projects, they know that it's nothing anymore and they're just wasting all of their time in creating those kind of Bitcoins when there's already one and thought that it will become a good project that will be invested by everyone.

To bad that we are seeing many projects trying to use that marketing ploy, when we know even bitcoin wouldn't be bitcoin today, because it is not the first one. Bitcoin is only up there at the first place because it is the most decentralized one and the first one. All others either are centralized, sucks, or both, there isn't a single project that has what bitcoin has. Sure the blockchain of bitcoin is an old sucky one, there is no doubt about that, there are many better blockchains out there, by far better even.

However, they all have devs working on it, making it not decentralized truly, even if it looks decentralized, the dev could do something, and people will accept it, so there is no need to consider anything as decentralized as bitcoin, which has no dev or central figure anymore.