--snip--
My point is those points aren't exactly "Key features" or outstanding compared with today's offline signing.
I appreciate your honest feedback — and I understand your hesitation.
I agree: most so-called "offline crypto" solutions today just mean signing on one device and broadcasting later via QR or USB. What I’m working on includes the full peer-to-peer transmission layer — without using traditional proximity-based channels like Bluetooth, NFC, or LoRa. And yes, the distance is global — not just short-range.
I said "offline signing", not "offline crypto" which usually refer to different thing.
--snip--
because i had done tests now guys you can check this my first offline transaction with proof i send 3000 satoshis
https://mempool.space/testnet/tx/501789e689cea0c90e1c18954811ad355c93b65032f107c8eeba6fed61ca50a2 I completed a full crypto transaction — from device to chain — with no connection, no data, no internet, and no infrastructure. It’s real. And it works.
✅ Transaction broadcasted successfully!
📨 TXID: {'txid': '501789e689cea0c90e1c18954811ad355c93b65032f107c8eeba6fed61ca50a2', 'response_dict': '501789e689cea0c90e1c18954811ad355c93b65032f107c8eeba6fed61ca50a2'}
TX data doesn't even contain information about how the TX is created or transmitted, so nobody can verify your statement.