Quote from: Free Market Capitalist on August 05, 2025, 04:19:06 PM

It took me a while to read this thread and the original, and at first I thought it might be a mistake by Denis_Verbinsky, as it could be similar to how certain casinos do not request KYC but below certain limits. I think that's the logical first impression we might have, as happened to The Cryptovator, for example, who ended up opening this thread. But looking at the case closely, this is unacceptable, so I support the flag.

At first glance, it will seem like a simple case, just a matter of a KYC issue. Since OP claims he has sent fresh coins, but the exchange is trying to tag them as dirty coins, then I decide to take a deep look. Though OP made mistakes by agreeing to their terms, the exchange shouldn't freeze any fresh coins. Otherwise they shouldn't allow any exchange to proceed without KYC verification, like other centralised exchanges actually work. So I ended up creating this thread because I feel dealing with this exchange is extremely high risk, and the victim should get back his funds. From this perspective I raised the flag against the exchange.

Quote from: Denis_Verbinsky on August 06, 2025, 11:57:06 AM

https://etherscan.io/address/0x26e0dd37eda29f37d371a864d0df6a39bd75e44e#tokentxns

This is the wallet I sent the coins to.

As you can see, they were transferred to WhiteBIT

Yes, it's pretty clear funds aren't dirty, and the exchange should return the funds. Noticed they were last active on August 3; I am waiting for them to become online. So they could notice their flags.