Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 14/08/2025, 21:40:52 UTC
This thread again?
5 more years meme has been around since 25 years. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it's a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD as a soft attack vector, used in social engineering to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
5 more years meme has been around since 25 years. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it's a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD as a soft attack vector, used in social engineering to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
Version 2
Edited on 07/08/2025, 22:10:45 UTC
This thread again?
5 more years meme has been around since 25 years. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it’'s a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD as a soft attack vector, used in social engineering to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
5 more years meme has been around since 25 years. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD as a soft attack vector, used in social engineering to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
Version 1
Scraped on 07/08/2025, 21:45:58 UTC
This thread again?
5 more years meme has been around10since 25 years ago. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it’s a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUDused as a soft attack vector, used in social engineering weapon to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
5 more years meme has been around
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
Original archived Re: Bitcoin must upgrade or fall victim to quantum computing in 5 years
Scraped on 07/08/2025, 21:41:25 UTC
This thread again?
5 more years meme has been around 10 years ago. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it’s a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD used as a social engineering weapon to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.
5 more years meme has been around 10 years ago. Quantum computing is still immature, overhyped, and needs physics defying hardware before even rivaling classical systems. No algorithm is going to fix the noise issue which is ultimately a boundary of physics. So unless we are hoping to discover new physics in the next 5 years, I do not see any danger to Bitcoin. Noise isn't just an engineering challenge, it’s a physics limit.
No, that is not quite correct. One danger I do see: Quantum FUD used as a social engineering weapon to leverage consensus.
Quantum computing was and is nothing but a hype. I don't care about new algorithms which beat out the old ones.