Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 2
Last scraped
Edited on 18/08/2025, 10:39:20 UTC
For clarity, it should be added that pooya87 engages in anti-Western propaganda, which is why he consistently distorts reality to some extent (sometimes even significantly), promoting anti-Western, pro-Iranian narratives.

The irony is that BRICS actually has a decent chance of development as an economic union, albeit with a political tint;
however:
1. Modern totalitarian and aggressive Iran will never be accepted there — it will remain a proxy of China.
2. There will always be significant economic imbalances within BRICS favoring the leading countries, which primarily use BRICS to achieve political rather than economic goals.

For pooya87, BRICS is just a pretext to convince everyone of the West’s failure and imminent collapse; he does not take BRICS seriously as an economic alliance.

Besides, BRICS will force the lazy ass of the West to start moving its butt — that is, to finally get serious about reforms, development, and political action.

After the 17th BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, there is no chance to call BRICS an ordinary bloc anymore because it is now clear that it has become a major competitor of America.

BRICS has never wanted to compete or challenge the US, NATO or the G7. Their goal was simply to create an economic and political union between member nations, and create a freer and more just world. Instead of depending on just one country and one organization, making the world more and more unfair and unbalanced when benefits belong to only one group.

If the US and EU do not abuse their power and bully other countries for their own interests. They maintain peace and balance in the world, I believe BRICS will never exist. Therefore, it cannot be said that BRICS was established to compete and become an opponent of the United States or NATO, but BRICS is the inevitable result of their abuse of power.
BRICS was created precisely to compete with the West — and I see nothing wrong with competition; in fact, it can be quite healthy. However, one important (and not so small) nuance is that the reasons behind BRICS’s creation were primarily political.
Version 1
Scraped on 11/08/2025, 11:09:26 UTC
For clarity, it should be added that pooya87 engages in anti-Western propaganda, which is why he consistently distorts reality to some extent (sometimes even significantly), promoting anti-Western, pro-Iranian narratives.

The irony is that BRICS actually has a decent chance of development as an economic union, albeit with a political tint;
however:
1. Modern totalitarian and aggressive Iran will never be accepted there — it will remain a proxy of China.
2. There will always be significant economic imbalances within BRICS favoring the leading countries, which primarily use BRICS to achieve political rather than economic goals.

For pooya87, BRICS is just a pretext to convince everyone of the West’s failure and imminent collapse; he does not take BRICS seriously as an economic alliance.

Besides, BRICS will force the lazy ass of the West to start moving its butt — that is, to finally get serious about reforms, development, and political action.

After the 17th BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, there is no chance to call BRICS an ordinary bloc anymore because it is now clear that it has become a major competitor of America.

BRICS has never wanted to compete or challenge the US, NATO or the G7. Their goal was simply to create an economic and political union between member nations, and create a freer and more just world. Instead of depending on just one country and one organization, making the world more and more unfair and unbalanced when benefits belong to only one group.

If the US and EU do not abuse their power and bully other countries for their own interests. They maintain peace and balance in the world, I believe BRICS will never exist. Therefore, it cannot be said that BRICS was established to compete and become an opponent of the United States or NATO, but BRICS is the inevitable result of their abuse of power.
BRICS was created precisely to compete with the West — and I see nothing wrong with competition; in fact, it can be quite healthy. However, one important (and not so small) nuance is that the reasons behind BRICS’s creation were primarily political.
Original archived Re: Trump doesn't even know the tariff he wants to impose on 56% of the world(BRICS)
Scraped on 11/08/2025, 10:39:47 UTC
For clarity, it should be added that pooya87 engages in anti-Western propaganda, which is why he consistently distorts reality to some extent (sometimes even significantly), promoting anti-Western, pro-Iranian narratives.

The irony is that BRICS actually has a decent chance of development as an economic union, albeit with a political tint;
however:
1. Modern totalitarian and aggressive Iran will never be accepted there — it will remain a proxy of China.
2. There will always be significant economic imbalances within BRICS favoring the leading countries, which primarily use BRICS to achieve political rather than economic goals.

For pooya87, BRICS is just a pretext to convince everyone of the West’s failure and imminent collapse; he does not take BRICS seriously as an economic alliance.

Besides, BRICS will force the lazy ass of the West to start moving its butt — that is, to finally get serious about reforms, development, and political action.