Quote from: internetional on August 12, 2025, 08:31:33 PM

Quote from: pig.gy on August 12, 2025, 05:15:03 PM

Self-custody: totally agreed, it’s best for many. Piggy is optional for those who want a simple, lock-and-leave habit to keep some winnings from boomeranging back.

And still, I don’t understand how this service could attract Bitcoin users. What’s the advantage of sending sats to your address instead of sending them to my own timelocked address? Any neural network can explain how to do it, or even help write a script to automate it. The days when this required technical skills are over.

Since this is all so trivial now, could you share a short example of creating a self-custody timelocked address, just a minimal step-by-step with tiny script snippet (CLTV/CSV is fine) to show the flow?

When you post it, remember you’re writing for a non-technical user. I’ve been in Bitcoin development for 10 years, and it’s still not easy for me. The worst part is you won’t know if the address works until the day arrives, some extra adrenaline.

With Piggy, it’s one click, no scripts and no risk of messing up and losing funds.