Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 3
Last scraped
Edited on 20/08/2025, 22:57:42 UTC
holy - the above is why you post misinformation.
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
Which, summer child, which part is me posting misinformation? Is it the points you're adding below that lead you to paint that I mislead with information, just like I "made up XYes rules with CLV"? If any, isn't it you who snipped my post so creatively that it leads to a whole different narrative? I won't even ask you to clarify that because I know you don't have the balls to address that attempt to twist my words into something else.
So, which part is it that I am giving misinformation? I believe I've explained in abundance before. Point us out, please. But before that, to safe you from unnecessary embarrasment, have you read the entire thread like I asked you to, and understand the dynamic of the thread? How the thread shifted from one attempt to another and then back to well... it's in your hand now, not sure what effort you're trying to help the player, you seemed too busy trying to paint me a color.
1. You didn't say bets gone final. Of course they can cancel bets that haven't started. The whole argument rests on games gone final.
2. You failed to mention parlays. Once again they can cancel individual bets. Parlays are a series of independent events.
3. Somehow you brought in odds provider again. You may have to go further up the food chain if you believe your 5 sources saying odds providers make financial decisions as far as payouts.
4. Your whole post is misinformation which is why ChatGPT and Gemini gave different answers when the point was brought up that the bets went final.
@ahoy - you're correct that I embarrass myself here. $300,000 is involved. I see it as a very simple case. You seem to think that too. holy is hurting the player's case with misinformation. Every time he posts something against the player, I get caught up.
.ahoy
Quote
Betfury should pay what's owed, plain and simple. You can't just cancel parleys after 75% of the games are won.
Version 2
Edited on 13/08/2025, 23:27:31 UTC
holy - the above is why you post misinformation.
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
Which, summer child, which part is me posting misinformation? Is it the points you're adding below that lead you to paint that I mislead with information, just like I "made up XYes rules with CLV"? If any, isn't it you who snipped my post so creatively that it leads to a whole different narrative? I won't even ask you to clarify that because I know you don't have the balls to address that attempt to twist my words into something else.
So, which part is it that I am giving misinformation? I believe I've explained in abundance before. Point us out, please. But before that, to safe you from unnecessary embarrasment, have you read the entire thread like I asked you to, and understand the dynamic of the thread? How the thread shifted from one attempt to another and then back to well... it's in your hand now, not sure what effort you're trying to help the player, you seemed too busy trying to paint me a color.
1. You didn't say bets gone final. Of course they can cancel bets that haven't started. The whole argument rests on games gone final.
2. You failed to mention parlays. Once again they can cancel individual bets. Parlays are a series of independent events.
3. Somehow you brought in odds provider again. You may have to go further up the food chain if you believe your 5 sources saying odds providers make financial decisions as far as payouts.
4. Your whole post is misinformation which is why ChatGPT and Gemini gave different answers when the point was brought up that the bets went final.
@ahoy - you're correct that I embarrass myself here. $300,000 is involved. I see it as a very simple case. You seem to think that too. holy is hurting the player's case with misinformation. Every time he posts something against the player, I get caught up.
.ahoy
Quote
Betfury should pay what's owed, plain and simple. You can't just cancel parleys after 75% of the games are won.
Version 1
Scraped on 13/08/2025, 23:02:40 UTC
holy - the above is why you post misinformation.
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
Which, summer child, which part is me posting misinformation? Is it the points you're adding below that lead you to paint that I mislead with information, just like I "made up XYes rules with CLV"? If any, isn't it you who snipped my post so creatively that it leads to a whole different narrative? I won't even ask you to clarify that because I know you don't have the balls to address that attempt to twist my words into something else.
So, which part is it that I am giving misinformation? I believe I've explained in abundance before. Point us out, please. But before that, to safe you from unnecessary embarrasment, have you read the entire thread like I asked you to, and understand the dynamic of the thread? How the thread shifted from one attempt to another and then back to well... it's in your hand now, not sure what effort you're trying to help the player, you seemed too busy trying to paint me a color.
1. You didn't say bets gone final. Of course they can cancel bets that haven't started.
2. You failed to mention parlays. Once again they can cancel individual bets. Parlays are a series of independent events.
3. Somehow you brought in odds provider again. You may have to go further up the food chain if you believe your 5 sources saying odds providers make decisions.
4. Your whole post is
.
Original archived Re: Betfury cancelled $300,000 worth of bets
Scraped on 13/08/2025, 22:58:08 UTC
holy - the above is why you post misinformation.
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
1. Other books don't cancel bets gone final without reasons listed below.
2. Did you ask after it went final or did you just say cancel?
3. You know that illegal rules get overruled by governing bodies.
4.You also misinterpret rules. Each leg of a parlay is an independent event. The bets not gone final can be cancelled.
5. You didn't show the question asked, except in your last image where you mention provider. The provider has 0 to do with financial dealings between player and book. The are an "odds provider".
[...]
Which, summer child, which part is me posting misinformation? Is it the points you're adding below that lead you to paint that I mislead with information, just like I "made up XYes rules with CLV"? If any, isn't it you who snipped my post so creatively that it leads to a whole different narrative? I won't even ask you to clarify that because I know you don't have the balls to address that attempt to twist my words into something else.
So, which part is it that I am giving misinformation? I believe I've explained in abundance before. Point us out, please. But before that, to safe you from unnecessary embarrasment, have you read the entire thread like I asked you to, and understand the dynamic of the thread? How the thread shifted from one attempt to another and then back to well... it's in your hand now, not sure what effort you're trying to help the player, you seemed too busy trying to paint me a color.
1. You didn't say bets gone final. Of course they can cancel bets that haven't started.
2. You failed to mention parlays. Once again they can cancel individual bets. Parlays are a series of independent events.
3. Somehow you brought in odds provider again. You may have to go further up the food chain if you believe your 5 sources saying odds providers make decisions.
4. Your whole post is misleading which is why ChatGPT and Gemini gave different answers when the point was brought up that the bets went final.
.