Quote from: GigaBit on August 16, 2025, 09:35:04 PM

DCA is an effective strategy for both rich and poor, especially those who are interested in long-term investment. There are many rich people who fail to be patient. Many of them do not feel very comfortable with long-term investment, on the other hand, some people with small incomes also invest long-term to achieve their goals. Being rich or poor is not the main thing. Those who are able to invest in Bitcoin with confidence and for the long term will definitely benefit. Bitcoin is completely free and even if it is equal for both rich and poor, those who can hold more Bitcoin will be successful.

You have highlighted the points very nicely. Indeed, sometimes it seems that being rich does not mean being a good investor. Patience, discipline, and understanding are the things that make the difference in the end. DCA is a simple but powerful strategy; those who can maintain it consistently see success over time. This is probably the strongest aspect of Bitcoin, so it does not favor anyone, but those who understand it move forward.

Quote from: Smartvirus on August 16, 2025, 11:44:44 PM

I think if those who don’t earn so much but still see Bitcoin to be a coin with some great potentials do mean to invest, they wouldn’t be so focused on what price it is for one bitcoin at the time but, shift their attentions towards what fraction of bitcoin they can allow themselves to buy and keep accumulating on the long run. It’s the one way to measure up if they ever what to be a part of this innovation rather than have all their attention focused on how high the price have gone. That way, it would be difficult buying!

What you say is very deep. Many right by thinking so much about the price. But you are right that the point is how much we can and how we can build it over time. The beauty of bitcoin is that even a small part can be part of the future potential. People often hold back because they think they cannot do the ‘whole’, but I think moving ‘slowly’ is a sign of real progress.