Quote from: junder on Today at 06:31:36 AM

Quote from: Powerjumboo on August 16, 2025, 11:32:37 PM

There will be no benefit in opposing where the government is taking action because the government has taken such a decision considering both the good and bad aspects. If gambling can be done by directly transferring money from e-wallets, it will be much easier and because it is much easier, young and old, students, men and women will all participate and quickly become addicted to gambling. I do not oppose the government's action. The government's action is a very good step in the interest of the people. Of course, the government's action will significantly reduce gambling addiction.

I agree with this. Criticizing or opposing the government's choices is likely futile, not just in this case, but in other areas as well. The government's choices are indeed good, as they may help reduce the level of gambling addiction in the community. The government isn't blocking access just making it more difficult. So, some people with serious gambling addictions will still find ways to access the games they desire. While this approach is less efficient, it does have its positive side.

Yes, the government is not completely banning gambling from its country, but the government has taken some decisions from its country so that people do not easily get addicted to gambling and do not push their careers towards complete destruction. For example, it is very easy to participate in gambling directly from e-wallets, and if this system is in force, people will easily deposit money in e-wallets and participate in gambling, which will increase their chances of becoming addicted to gambling many times over. So, considering all aspects, the government has taken such a decision that the decision is quite reasonable.