Quote from: bitzizzix on August 18, 2025, 09:34:54 AM

Quote from: Inwestour on August 18, 2025, 04:12:55 AM

Quote from: Russlenat on August 17, 2025, 04:26:50 AM

It’s almost impossible with sports betting, but very possible with slots.

I saw a post on Metawin X where someone turned $20 into $10k. Honestly, I haven’t seen many like that in sports betting. So maybe if we’re aiming for a huge win, it’s better to play slots than rely on a parlay in sports betting.

What do you think , do you agree with my observation, or would you say they’re basically the same? Because from what I’ve seen, not just in the casino I mentioned but also in others like Stake, there are plenty of shared bet slips where gamblers hit huge payouts from a small bankroll.

https://x.com/Meta_Winners/status/1955665519614591474/photo/1

Parlay is better in my opinion because you choose the matches yourself, while in slots you rely only on luck and nothing depends on you. Maybe such a win will go to one player out of thousands, but more often the winnings are much smaller. Parlays with high odds also win, and there are players who can repeat this more than once, but it is not for everyone and it is also difficult.

In my opinion, both rely on luck, and while parlays require skill, luck plays a bigger role.
And between the two, it all depends on your betting habits or frequency. I mean, if you frequently bet on parlays over the long term, you're bound to win. The same goes for slot games, but regardless of the type of game, the percentage of losses is higher than the percentage of wins, and that's true.
And the reason you rate slots better than parlays is because you play slots frequently and vice versa, and when you win and lose in between, you assume one is better. It's actually the same, it depends on your habits, and there's luck involved in both, which you'll get when luck is on your side.

The fact is that what people are chasing is a way to monopolise the game, whether it's parlay or slots, so that it favours themselves (perhaps the belief of people who want instant results), convincing themselves that even though the game system is sometimes not in line with their desires, they want to make a profit quickly, even with little capital. By the way, that person might have hit the jackpot, which could be the luckiest day of their life Grin

. It's true that every type of game has benefits beyond the profits felt by each user, so they feel comfortable and avoid rushing or resorting to any means, including continuously depleting their capital with full ambition.

That's how it should be, right? So even if you win big like the person above, it would be wiser to spread/use your money in other slots/parlays, maybe even spread it across different developers even if the genre is the same. In my opinion, if you spread it out, the chances of winning will also be different because you are competing with different systems (different companies). Even if they lose, the losses might be minimised.

What I mean is, if someone enjoys the game and has a large bankroll, suppose they deposit at slot companies A, B, C, and D. If they lose at company A and their balance runs out, there should be a solution-oriented approach. They should be able to control their emotions and not let greed take over, as the loss is only in one account. The other accounts can be considered safe because they have limited their play for the day, allowing them to play a little longer. D, they could also later deposit into the losing account from another slot company. Imagine how extensive the management is, and this also applies to parlay users, depending on their preference.