empty blocks can occur few a few reasons.

Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a

possibility for an empty block.


Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start.

second case possibility.

I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons.

The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times.

the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie

a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes

is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes

those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do .

And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take
and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take.

It would take a ton of math to figure if what they do pays off.

as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks.

I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes



but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut
vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut


it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way.


I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain.

as to why some pools decide to skip  >0.9 or lower fees once again the stats do not exist no one has studied which method works better.

It could be it is being studied as I type.

and we may see all pools go to 0.1 min or 0.2 min or whatever.

empty blocks can occur few a few reasons.

Rapid fire hitting of blocks and an empty or close to empty memory pool is always a

possibility for an empty block.


Or some pools shoot for a short cut prebuilt header which creates a small head start.

second case possibility.

I am sure there are other ways someone may explain other reasons.

The first one do one can do anything about and will happen at times.

the second one is a bet that a pool makes ie

a block of 3.125 + 0 every 59 minutes

is better than a block of 3.125+0.05 =3.175 coins every 60 minutes

those numbers are approximate but this is what antpool tries to do .

And they certainly do hit more blocks with the shortcut they take
and they certainly get less fees with the short cut they take.

It would take a ton of math to figure if what they do pays off.

as I do not know how much time they save and how much faster they make blocks.

I estimated 1 block every 59 minutes vs 1 block every 60 minutes



but maybe the number is 1 block every 32 minutes =0.533 hours short cut
vs 1 block every 32 minutes and 30 seconds =no short cut


it would be very challenging to figure out if they make more money their way.


I can tell you this method is likely to work better with larger pools than pools with very little hash.  but I do not know how much speed they gain.