We are aware that gambling has been portrayed always shown usin its two sides of a coin one that gives us warningfaces; the first portrays warnings and the self-control options onmechanism and the other it lures ussecond promotes mass bunkering into the depths of the game. I willdo not rejectrefute the primary claimfact that it is up to each person to make the finalend of the decision still lies in the hands of a person, however,but I also thinkpredictively believe that gambling firms contribute to this process extensively as they encouragecompanies help people to take a stepgo further than they wantedplanned. Indeed,I am sure you can observe howimagine the language ofway that the persuasive words are used to create the promotions is developed in such a convincing manner like, the games are constructedscripted to grant anstimulate the adrenaline boost everyall the time you are playing, orand the sense of being on the winning streak is simulated under the circumstancesas an imminent possibility even when your chancesthe odds are so unlikelyagainst you.

I would sayhave understood that this case demonstratesis an indication that a person can never blameit is not only people to be blamed since the system is shaped in the way thathas been set to incorporate people stay in that circle. We mustshould understand that, not all people possess theevery person has strong mental strengthwill to keep the temptation of giving in towithstand such stimuli at bay particularly, in particular when the element of emotion and love of fast moneyemotional factors are involved as well as the urge to make easy money. Therefore, regardless ofeven with the existence of official warnings, theit is a fact remains that the companies continue tostill contribute to the enhancement of the risk, and itthis fact cannot be neglected because it ismake their responsibilityinvolvement neglected.

We are aware that gambling has always shown us two sides of a coin one that gives us warning and self-control options on the other it lures us into the depths of the game. I will not reject the primary claim that it is up to each person to make the final decision, however, I also think that gambling firms contribute to this process extensively as they encourage people to take a step further than they wanted. Indeed, you can observe how the language of promotions is developed in such a convincing manner like games are constructed to grant an adrenaline boost every time you are playing, or the sense of being on the winning streak is simulated under the circumstances when your chances are so unlikely.

I would say that this case demonstrates that a person can never blame people since the system is shaped in the way that people stay in that circle. We must understand that, not all people possess the mental strength to keep the temptation of giving in to such stimuli at bay particularly when the element of emotion and love of fast money are involved. Therefore, regardless of the official warnings, the fact remains that companies continue to contribute to the risk and it cannot be neglected because it is their responsibility.