The last decision taken by theymos reduced drastically the number of campaigns and potential campaigns. I say even the quality is altered because we know that the banned ones last longer than casinos which represents the most of actual campaigns.
Just a couple of them lasted very long but so did some casinos. The only difference perhaps is most mixers has big pay rates but on the number of campaigns right now vs the number right before the ban. I would say the numbers are pretty close, if not we could even be having more campaigns right now.
I've always been curious if a given campaign is meeting its expectations, whether the user base or revenue increases (or both), with this happening during the campaign's runtime. Do companies attribute this to signature marketing campaigns or precisely analyze each source, whether through signature links, referrals, etc?
I find this interesting.
Maybe partly. Just go to the
12th page of the gambling board and look at the casinos that tried maybe a couple of weeks of advertising here
and just left. No one even talks about them today, while those that are active are on the first or second page