~~~
Use statistic.
Zirkzee, 49 matches, 7 goals = 14%
Hojlund, 95 matches, 26 goals = 27%
This mean Hojlund has almost double the chance to score a goal compared to Zirkzee.
If I'm the one who make decision, I want Hojlund to stay and sell Zirkzee. Amorim is joking he prefer Mount over both of them, Mount has 8% chance because he played for 48 matches and only score 4 goals.
Not just the goal scored, Mason Mount is hardly fit. He is an injury prone player and he hardly completes a season without spending time on the sidelines. I don't know if Amorim has also considered that. But if Mason Mount can be fit for a full season he can give more. Mason mount is a fine player, my only concern over him is his injury problem. Amorim is not keeping Mount for goalscoring, but for the quality he brings to Manchester United midfield, Mason mount is not a striker as Zirkzee and Hojlund, so we shouldn't judge Mount by the number of goals scored.