Bruh, the rich -poor betting disparity is not an issuecase of odds, it is purebona fide mathematics. It is pretty obvious that largermassive bankrolls will allowlet you to take advantageedge  of intelligentsharp sizing such as the Kelly Criterion to take maximumheighest advantage of long-termlongterm growth and& to evade destructionwrecking. ButHowever people who have very little money andtiny cash & are trying to chasehunt big odds are not reallyin truth investing but are just contestingvie for for lottery. It is almost a guarantee that these folks would eventuallyafter a bit  end up losing all their capitalfunds due to the gambler’sgamblers ruin as limited money against the house advantageedge statistically means loss. Moreover,as well  inequality drives more desperate, risky investments in less wealthy districts, making a feedback loop of harm. Well yea, you are not only getting screwed up by luck but structuralsystemic maths and& income inequalitypolarity are also hitting you.

Bruh, the rich-poor betting disparity is not an issue of odds, it is pure mathematics. It is pretty obvious that larger bankrolls will allow you to take advantage of intelligent sizing such as the Kelly Criterion to take maximum advantage of long-term growth and to evade destruction. But people who have very little money and are trying to chase big odds are not really investing but are just contesting for lottery. It is almost a guarantee that these folks would eventually end up losing all their capital due to the gambler’s ruin as limited money against the house advantage statistically means loss. Moreover, inequality drives more desperate, risky investments in less wealthy districts, making a feedback loop of harm. Well yea, you are not only getting screwed up by luck but structural maths and income inequality are also hitting you.