Quote from: nutildah on Today at 08:42:02 PM

Yeah definitely something off about this account. They seem to be copy/pasting largely AI-generated material. Additionally, they seem to be an alt account of Phu Juck, who posts in a similarly mechanical fashion. These accounts have shared most of their merit between themselves. They have a few posts that are straight-up AI:

Edit: I just noticed that there's a huge gap in the account's post history, possibly indicating that it has switched hands.

Great job in finding more of his posts, but also for checking who he has sent merit to. The other account also looks fishy but has fewer posts the last few months. The issue is that both accounts have ranked up and already have quite a few posts themselves, practically eliminating the chance of nuking them, with our only option remaining to tag them both with a neutral tag.

Although this post is a little old (end of May, not many recent posts) but I grabbed it completely coincidental, it's 100% detected as AI from GPTZero.

Quote from: Phu Juck on May 28, 2025, 04:09:30 PM

Bitcoin has been high of value always compared to its fork coins and here is why:

Instead to its fork coins, Bitcoin has had a very clear goal to be a P2P currency and a store of value, where code does not get changed too easily because Bitcoin wants to be a stead safe haven, where value can be stored easily and maintained easily.
Code changes in Bitcoin have always been controversial and Bitcoin always tried to maintain status quo, where no code gets changed too easily, making Bitcoin a big promise as a safe haven for money.

Some of Bitcoin’s fork coins have been involved in big fraud

As a shady coin, Bitcoin SV is known to be a big scamcoin, where owner Craig Wright has evolved as a disgusting scammer and he was labelled “Faketoshi” for his unproven claims to be Satoshi but Craig Wright could not deliver any proof to be Satoshi.
He only achieved to be a fraudulent scammer because once again, his claims could not be verified as Craig Wright failed to deliver a substantial proof to be Satoshi Nakamoto, so his coins got rightfully dumped

Bitcoin’s fork coins have not gained enough crypto community support

Crypto community support for Bitcoin’s fork coins has been very low and Bitcoin’s fork coins have not gained enough community support for various points such like transaction count, transaction volume or popularity compared to Bitcoin. It has to be said for Bitcoin’s fork coins to be very low crypto community support overall.
Bitcoin’s fork coins are overally used not very much for transactions and it is a massive difference to Bitcoin’s volume and number of transactions.

Bitcoin does not need to be forked

Bitcoin does not need to be forked because it is simply a good coin. We don’t need any fork because Bitcoin is good how it is.
Bitcoin can’t be hacked or destroyed easily
Bitcoin is an amazing store of value
Bitcoin does what it should do: send and receive P2P transactions
Bitcoin’s network doesn’t get down easily like Solana does
Bitcoin has proven to be a good coin for almost 15 years now

We clearly don’t need to fork Bitcoin to make in fundamentally different like so many unsuccessful forks have done and have failed to be an attractive coin.