Quote from: Botnake on August 23, 2025, 03:01:01 AM

Quote from: bbc.reporter on August 23, 2025, 02:45:56 AM

It can be a split draw similar to what you have said, it can also be a unanimous draw where all of the judges have declared a draw or it can be a majority draw where 2 of 3 judges have declared the fight a draw and 1 of the judges have declared Canelo or Bud Crawford the winner.

On your story about the corrupt judge, this proves that Las Vegas does not want Canelo to lose. However, Las Vegas also does not want Bud Crawford to lose hehehehehe. They might pay 2 judges to make it certain that the fight will be a draw hehehehe.

It’s easy for a fight like this to end in a draw if both boxers are very competitive. In fact, a draw favors the promoters since it opens the door for a rematch, and more fans would be interested after seeing how close the first fight was.

We can’t deny corruption exists in boxing, it’s been reported many times in the past. But without solid evidence it remains speculation.

The real question is, if you believe a draw is possible, would you be willing to risk your money on that result?

Hehehe we should live in reality. The corruption in boxing is certainly not a speculation. This is an open secret already. This is very much similar to the government. Do you need proof that corruption is happening in the government to say that this is not only a speculation? It would be headshaking if you think that the government officials are not corrupt. This is why the wanted to be government officials. They did not join this to serve, they joined this because they want to be a part of the corruption hehehe.