Next scheduled rescrape ... in 3 days
Version 2
Last scraped
Scraped on 25/08/2025, 05:24:02 UTC
@JayJuanGee - Well, it was only an offer (in which I would have hidden my face and source any identification) because I just wanted to clear things up since there was apparently still 'suspicions'.. It wouldn't have exposed or jeopardized my opsec - though I have no reason to conceal it...

There are easy and straight-forward ways that you seem to understand but continue to ignore, as if there were some role for drama in these here parts, even though sure, there may well be some guys with a sense of humor.... and find some entertainment-value in your so far presentation choices.

[edited out]
@d_eddie:
It would be an earlier picture (which is actually a good thing) taken of me at same desk sending code with different (minimal) equipment compared to extensive gear layout on same desk, but a couple pieces of notable equipment would be in both pictures (minimal equipment pic & extensive equipment pic).

Not sure what you mean by 'Wall observer mark'.  
Let me know.



For viewability.  You don't know how to cite images?

From my perspective, these don't mean shit in terms of contemporariness.

[edited out]
Oh - Wall Observer 'WO' sign or mark - I understand now!
Okay - Here ya go!  What does that provide?

Y'all tell me watcha think?
I'm going to bed...

Yeah, with this latest image, you show that you know how to do it, but not within a context.  

I personally give little shits about your physicality or your need to show any body parts, even though you seem to have had chosen to do so.. And anyhow, something like a hand written piece of paper with a date and perhaps something like your username would be good enough as long as it waswere to be coupled by a context that shows some kind of variation of the equipment and/or the space or area that you had shown in earlier likely plagiarized pics.. ..and perhaps some explanation too.. which seems to ONLY be getting worse..

MuchAnd, yeah, much of this comes off as bullshit.. at least so far in your digging of your further holes. unless I am reading it all wrong and there happens to be some there there with valid connection and/or explanationexplanations that I had been missing and not showing up on my screen.. .. ... but yeah.. maybe your apologizing and saying that you were just making shit up would might well be a better way forward? to proceed from here on out.

 Even though, so far, you have been able to get attention and waste a lot of time, space and pixels with seeming nonsense... but at least you got one confirmed believer, so farup until now.. .   Your mom might also vouch for you, as a bonus... just like expHorizons had gotten his grandma to vouch for him with a plate of cookies, not that I am suggesting bribes, but it might go better than your so far lame attempts.   Tongue
Version 1
Scraped on 25/08/2025, 04:59:03 UTC
@JayJuanGee - Well, it was only an offer (in which I would have hidden my face and source any identification) because I just wanted to clear things up since there was apparently still 'suspicions'.. It wouldn't have exposed or jeopardized my opsec - though I have no reason to conceal it...

There are easy and straight-forward ways that you seem to understand but continue to ignore, as if there were some role for drama in these here parts, even though sure, there may well be some guys with a sense of humor.... and find some entertainment-value in your so far presentation choices.

[edited out]
@d_eddie:
It would be an earlier picture (which is actually a good thing) taken of me at same desk sending code with different (minimal) equipment compared to extensive gear layout on same desk, but a couple pieces of notable equipment would be in both pictures (minimal equipment pic & extensive equipment pic).

Not sure what you mean by 'Wall observer mark'.  
Let me know.



For viewability.  You don't know how to cite images?

From my perspective, these don't mean shit in terms of contemporariness.

[edited out]
Oh - Wall Observer 'WO' sign or mark - I understand now!
Okay - Here ya go!  What does that provide?

Y'all tell me watcha think?
I'm going to bed...

Yeah, with this latest image, you show that you know how to do it, but not within a context.  

I personally give little shits about your physicality or your need to show any body parts, even though you seem to have had chosen to do so.. And anyhow, something like a hand written piece of paper with a date and perhaps something like your username would be good enough as long as it was coupled by a context that shows some variation of the equipment and/or the space or area that you had shown in earlier likely plagiarized pics..

Much of this comes off as bullshit.. at least so far in your digging of your holes. unless I am reading it all wrong and there happens to be some valid connection and/or explanation.. ... but yeah.. maybe apologizing and saying that you were just making shit up would might well be a better way forward?

 Even though you have been able to get attention and waste a lot of time, space and pixels with seeming nonsense... but at least you got one believer, so far.    Your mom might vouch for you, as a bonus.
Original archived Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Scraped on 25/08/2025, 04:53:43 UTC
@JayJuanGee - Well, it was only an offer (in which I would have hidden my face and source any identification) because I just wanted to clear things up since there was apparently still 'suspicions'.. It wouldn't have exposed or jeopardized my opsec - though I have no reason to conceal it...

There are easy and straight-forward ways that you seem to understand but continue to ignore, as if there were some role for drama..

[edited out]
@d_eddie:
It would be an earlier picture (which is actually a good thing) taken of me at same desk sending code with different (minimal) equipment compared to extensive gear layout on same desk, but a couple pieces of notable equipment would be in both pictures (minimal equipment pic & extensive equipment pic).

Not sure what you mean by 'Wall observer mark'.  
Let me know.



For viewability.  You don't know how to cite images?

From my perspective, these don't mean shit in terms of contemporariness.

[edited out]
Oh - Wall Observer 'WO' sign or mark - I understand now!
Okay - Here ya go!  What does that provide?

Y'all tell me watcha think?
I'm going to bed...

Yeah, with this latest image, you show that you know how to do it, but not within a context. 

I personally give little shits about your physicality or your need to show any body parts, even though you seem to have had chosen to do so.. And anyhow, something like a hand written piece of paper with a date and perhaps something like your username would be good enough as long as it was coupled by a context that shows some variation of the equipment and/or the space or area that you had shown in earlier likely plagiarized pics..

Much of this comes off as bullshit.. at least so far in your digging of your holes. unless I am reading it all wrong and there happens to be some valid connection and/or explanation.. ... but yeah.. maybe apologizing and saying that you were just making shit up would might well be a better way forward?

 Even though you have been able to get attention and waste a lot of time, space and pixels with seeming nonsense... but at least you got one believer, so far.   Your mom might vouch for you, as a bonus.