Next scheduled rescrape ... in 4 days
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 27/08/2025, 04:30:53 UTC
Isn't the use of AI synonymous to plagiarism, are you the one that wrote what was there being copied or do you take your time in referencing that the content was AI the same way plagiarism was done.

For those coming to this forum newly, the use of AI is not against the rules here, but you can get tagged for posting AI contents because you're not the one that make such by your own self, the same way a plagiarists does, while plagiarism will get you banned, I will advise none of these should be allowed, we are making real discussion here and not what we could have gotten from the use of a bot.
Like this.
Both posts are probably AI generated content, but member Daxian198402 is 100% doing plagiarism spam.
Note that I am going to delete his post because this is my self-moderated topic, to avoid spam like this.
I also received two almost identical PM's from different accounts.  Roll Eyes

This will be a good source of writing down the seed phrase once a durable and quality material is considered for use, but what u don't know is the duration at which this maker colour material could last, that being said, I will still say that we should also have an additional backup storage for our seed phrase, in case of being lost or inaccessible, since it has a characteristics that proves fire resistance.

This will be a good source of writing down the seed phrase once a durable and quality material is considered for use, but what u don't know is the duration at which this maker colour material could last, that being said, I will still say that we should also have an additional backup storage for our seed phrase, in case of being lost or inaccessible, since it has a characteristics that proves fire resistance.

I am not sure whether you or Daxian198402 plagiarized here, not look into two accounts but if from two posts and times of publishing, you are plagiarist in this context.

I recall that you plagiarized, were banned and were given a second chance too.

Not sure but if you actually did it, the second chance given to your account is useless.
Original archived Re: Why still plagiarize when there is AI?
Scraped on 27/08/2025, 04:25:49 UTC
Isn't the use of AI synonymous to plagiarism, are you the one that wrote what was there being copied or do you take your time in referencing that the content was AI the same way plagiarism was done.

For those coming to this forum newly, the use of AI is not against the rules here, but you can get tagged for posting AI contents because you're not the one that make such by your own self, the same way a plagiarists does, while plagiarism will get you banned, I will advise none of these should be allowed, we are making real discussion here and not what we could have gotten from the use of a bot.
Like this.
Both posts are probably AI generated content, but member Daxian198402 is 100% doing plagiarism spam.
Note that I am going to delete his post because this is my self-moderated topic, to avoid spam like this.
I also received two almost identical PM's from different accounts.  Roll Eyes

This will be a good source of writing down the seed phrase once a durable and quality material is considered for use, but what u don't know is the duration at which this maker colour material could last, that being said, I will still say that we should also have an additional backup storage for our seed phrase, in case of being lost or inaccessible, since it has a characteristics that proves fire resistance.

This will be a good source of writing down the seed phrase once a durable and quality material is considered for use, but what u don't know is the duration at which this maker colour material could last, that being said, I will still say that we should also have an additional backup storage for our seed phrase, in case of being lost or inaccessible, since it has a characteristics that proves fire resistance.

I am not sure whether you or Daxian198402 plagiarized here, not look into two accounts but if from two posts and times of publishing, you are plagiarist in this context.

I recall that you plagiarized, were banned and were given a second chance too.