Quote from: Zlantann on Today at 11:35:35 AM

Quote from: Odohu on Today at 08:48:08 AM

The answer is affirmative, signature campaigns paid to casinos actually make you to gamble. There are some instances in which the payment for signature campaign is less than the minimum withdrawal, in that case one will be required to bet with it to aim for the minimum withdrawal to be able to make withdrawal. Apart from this, the temptation to gamble when you have some balance is very high which is why payment of signature campaign into the casino actually make one to gamble more.

There was a case in the forum where the minimum withdrawal was higher than the signature weekly payment, and many people frowned at it. The best option was to wait and receive more than one weekly payment before withdrawal ( if the campaign lasts more than one week).

I remembered that issue and how some of the participants even took the case to the reputation board siting that the withdrawal fee they were supposed to pay together with the payment being lower than the minimum withdrawal was a bit frustrating to them. I don't know how the matter ended though but it generate arguments with some people supporting the casino and some against them.

Quote from: Zlantann on Today at 11:35:35 AM

Back to the topic, it is tempting for gamblers to receive payments in casinos. The temptation is even higher if it is a reputable casino that has many enticing offers. But if the forum is not a source of income, using just signature earnings for gambling is a smart move.

This is another good point you have made. If the earning from signature campaign can be channeled into gambling, and the user have other jobs, it will be great and just one major win will make him recover months of the signature earning. This will really be a huge relief and something I will give a thought. Although what I gamble with some weeks is more than what I earn in signature campaign but not above my budget.