Quote from: betswift on August 29, 2025, 12:42:29 PM

If you want it - you need a capital and expertise from around any sphere, basically, and people usually don't have such capital (fortunately or not, that's a good question too Grin

).

That's true but besides that everything has its time. Sometimes some things are popular, then they get forgotten and then they become popular again. Sometimes absolutely a different thing becomes popular and so on, the cycle continues. NFTs will boom again, ICOs might boom again too.

Quote from: pooya87 on September 01, 2025, 03:27:14 AM

Quote from: Abiky on September 01, 2025, 01:12:05 AM

proposed censoring Ordinals inscriptions on-chain via the node software. Glad it didn't work out, otherwise, the community would've been going against Bitcoin's censorship-resistant ideals.

Are people still stuck on this thing?!

Preventing abuse of the protocol and not relaying transactions that are exploiting it is not called censorship. If it were then bitcoin would have always been censored because from very early days we introduced standard rules that have been preventing a large number of abusive usage of Bitcoin and are still not relaying a lot of non-standard transactions.

I completely agree with pooya87 here. It's not a censorship to exploit something that ruins the whole network. We, humans have free will but that doesn't really translate into absolutely free will. You have no right to take someone else's life despite the fact that you have a free will of that. Things don't work that way and it's better to cut out the poison before it reaches the heart, even in a completely free world.