Quote from: peter0425 on Today at 10:39:49 AM

Distributing your bitcoins in more than one wallets will save you in the future and El Salvador knows this.

No, this is not correct. Don't make declarative statements on topics which you do not understand. Distributing to more addresses or wallets does not do anything to safeguard against quantum computers. What is important is whether an address has been reused or not.

Quote from: Oshosondy on Today at 11:58:13 AM

Even without quantum computing threat, I do not like to hold my coins on a single wallet. I have at least 3 different bitcoin wallets because I think it is better than having just only one.

It is not. Three averagely secured wallets is worse than one with maximum security.

Quote from: Beparanf on Today at 12:04:17 PM

Hacker will start attacking first Satoshi wallet before them if they are afraid of this risk in the future which they will have time to react before their wallet will be hacked.

You are making an assumption that may not be true. Satohi's addresses are a prime target through which mass panic can be caused which would lead to fast security upgrades. Instead, silently compromising a wallet here and there would be a better approach.

Quote from: Solosanz on Today at 12:06:01 PM

Michael Saylor is actually correct, I didn't thought it could be a marketing for another scam coins who brand themselves as quantum computing. Probably yes, sooner or later the market will flood with quantum tokens because that's what the subject people talk nowadays.

Naive people fall for naive scams, there is nothing that can be done to prevent this from happening.

Quote from: Solosanz on Today at 12:06:01 PM

Quantum computing will destruct centralized projects first because they have lower security than Bitcoin.

Wrong, don't write nonsense in this kind of threads. The threat of QC depends on the algorithms used, not on-chain economic security.