Next scheduled rescrape ... never
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 30/08/2025, 19:10:50 UTC
I had to go through the International Monetary Fund (IMF) report on El Salvador's fund facility and found this:
Quote
Most end-March targets, on the primary balance, external and financial buffers, were met with margins, and the overall stock of Bitcoin held by the public sector has remained unchanged since program approval

El Salvador and the IMF signed this new deal in December 2024. The report states clearly that they have not bought any Bitcoin since January. I was expecting  Salvador’s Bitcoin Office and the National Commission of Digital Assets to dispute this report but they were silent.
If they publicly dispute it, it could cause them problems. It is better to silently continue doing what you are doing. Even if it were true, all it shows that they had more BTC than was expected by the public. In any case eventually the counter must reach the real number after which they would have to stop counting or buy more BTC.

I have one main wallet, but I used a truly random method to generate my mnemonic phrase, using dice rolls, verified by a python script to be correct. Furthermore, I have added an additional bip39 passphrase which is kept in a separate location, and it's all secured by an antiphishing hardware wallet. This is where my main coin are, then I also have another wallet with less coins.
Sounds good, much better than the multi wallet methods by wannabe experts.  Wink
Original archived Re: El Salvador moved their bitcoins
Scraped on 30/08/2025, 19:05:19 UTC
I had to go through the International Monetary Fund (IMF) report on El Salvador's fund facility and found this:
Quote
Most end-March targets, on the primary balance, external and financial buffers, were met with margins, and the overall stock of Bitcoin held by the public sector has remained unchanged since program approval

El Salvador and the IMF signed this new deal in December 2024. The report states clearly that they have not bought any Bitcoin since January. I was expecting  Salvador’s Bitcoin Office and the National Commission of Digital Assets to dispute this report but they were silent.
If they publicly dispute it, it could cause them problems. It is better to silently continue doing what you are doing. Even if it were true, all it shows that they had more BTC than was expected by the public. In any case eventually the counter must reach the real number after which they would have to stop counting or buy more BTC.