Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Next scheduled rescrape ... in 2 days
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 01/09/2025, 08:30:32 UTC
Can it differentdifferentiate the posts the person make in boards that the campaign managers will not count from the ones the campaign managers will count?

Also can you make a Telegram bot in addition to this? I would have preferpreferred it if it is ona Telegram bot and it will be easy for people to setup.

The third is that I can easily count my weekly posts but from the process, I and also do not count the posts that are not valid.

Quote from: examplens on August 31, 2025, 11:11:11 PM
However, I'm not sure how much a tool like this can directly affect the quality of someone's posts. It seems to me that it is like a control for posters to see whether they have fulfilled the requirements of the campaign signature. It recognizes several of the most common campaign conditions, such as the total number of posts, the number in the gambling section, and earned merit.
The idea of automating the counting of posts in the campaign has already been discussed several times, and as far as I know, a sufficiently efficient solution that will recognize the quality of the posts has not been found.
Campaign managers will have to go through each posts people are posting even if the tools will determine if a post is having good quality or not. This tool will only be useful for posters and not campaign managers.
Original archived Re: [TOOL] Bitcointalk Weekly Post & Merit Tracker
Scraped on 01/09/2025, 08:25:05 UTC
Can it different the posts the person make in boards that the campaign managers will not count from the ones the campaign managers will count?

Also can you make a Telegram bot in addition to this? I would have prefer it if it is on Telegram and it will be easy for people to setup.

The third is that I can easily count my weekly posts but from the process, I also do not count the posts that are not valid.

Quote from: examplens on August 31, 2025, 11:11:11 PM
However, I'm not sure how much a tool like this can directly affect the quality of someone's posts. It seems to me that it is like a control for posters to see whether they have fulfilled the requirements of the campaign signature. It recognizes several of the most common campaign conditions, such as the total number of posts, the number in the gambling section, and earned merit.
The idea of automating the counting of posts in the campaign has already been discussed several times, and as far as I know, a sufficiently efficient solution that will recognize the quality of the posts has not been found.
Campaign managers will have to go through each posts people are posting even if the tools will determine if a post is having good quality or not. This tool will only be useful for posters and not campaign managers.