Quote from: ultrloa on Today at 09:05:28 AM

Also there's good chance that JD Vance will be Trump successor since he's early favorite to assume the office after Trumps administration ends https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5477141-republican-candidates-2028-election/ So if it happens that JD Vance will win there's huge chance that Bitcoin will still be in good situation.

For me, the most important thing would be for this to become a non-partisan issue and for the main crypto companies to lobby to convince the Democratic Party as well, so that if it wins in the future, it will forget about the madness of CBDCs and continue with a policy favorable to cryptocurrencies. Mainly Bitcoin, but I think dollar-pegged stablecoins can also be important for the US. I don't care about shitcoins, but I think they will be included in the lobbying.

Quote from: Lucius on Today at 10:46:04 AM

That man gives me the creeps, because there is something extremely evil about him and I think he would just be an even more extreme version of the person who is president today. However, if he continues current policy, he will be supported by all those who think that he is good for business, regardless of all the other negativity that can (and very likely will) result from his possible victory in the next elections.

He gives you the creeps because of your prejudice. He's a guy who had everything stacked against him, who grew up in a poor environment surrounded by poverty and drug addiction, in a hillbilly area, and has become vice president of the United States. That's why the Democrats and the left hate him. He didn't buy into the victim narrative and wait for the state to solve his life by giving him welfare or something like that. To top it all off, his wife is Indian and his children are mixed race.

For you, better the mummy who didn't even know what she was signing, who was going to implement CBDCs, or the woman who made a fool of herself repeatedly during the election campaign.