Quote from: nutildah on Today at 08:27:18 PM

Yep, this is 100% the way I see it as well. I mean, peeps that engage in AI shitposting are doing the exact same thing plagiarists are doing: implicitly taking credit for content they didn't create. And its largely for the same reason, which is to avoid having to use one's own brain.

Posting AI material is perhaps even more offensive than plagiarizing IMHO. After all, any idiot can do what these people are doing. Meaning, any idiot has access to ChatGPT or Grok and can feed it a post to respond to or ask it to generate a summary of this or that topic.

There's absolutely no reason to plagarism anymore, AI tools can do that too, along with writing a complete summary within seconds. It can find sources for any kind of article within seconds.

The only positive thing I've noticed the past few months is that the number of reports for AI has gone down. I also remember reporting anywhere from three to five users on a weekly basis, but now it's a lot more sparse. It seems that our efforts have discouraged some people from even trying to get away with AI usage. On the other hand, I've also noticed that I'm receiving mixed results in users that's almost certain are using AI, which is a little concerning because some people are finding ways to manipulate the detectors.