It seems that I may have been prescient in my other thread, but that didn't really go anywhere. I've just learnt that Africa has implemented an alternative Internet that avoids using Google and American servers and transport. There is a possibility that South America will do the same thing. I think people are concerned about the technocrats supporting the Global elite and disadvantaging the people. At the fundamental conceptual level, Bitcoin should be able to take advantage of this. How will it do it though? Obviously it will need a different node to handle the different African protocol, but the basic ledgers should be the same on both systems. Will this node need a port for each Internet? A cross over service will lead to centralisation, and will act against the strength of Bitcoin's independence.
Africa's not running a "separate internet" it is just expanding local IXPs (270+ now vs 50 in 2020) and Afri-IX peering. Actual traffic still flows globally: 85% of African internet crosses US/EU cables. Bitcoin doesn't need protocol forks - just local node clusters (like Kenya's BitPesa Nodes running on Safaricom's fiber). Crossover risk? Zero. Bitcoin's P2P network auto-routes via Tor/I2P where needed. Real opportunity: satellite nodes (Starlink coverage hit 92% of Africa in Aug 2025, and going up ). Let's build regional node maps and not hypothetical splits.