But since laziness is one of the major reasons why people plagiarize and make use of AI, with the time and research that most people spend just to discover a way they can use to humanize AI-written content, if they also invest the same time in learning, can’t they just expand and present something from their head, or is laziness not just the only issue here, but most of them lack what to offer and just need an AI to do the thinking for them? Or it could probably be a lack of self-confidence.
Both a lack of knowledge and self-confidence are the reasons why people use AI to generate posts for them, because they understand that an AI model will have more knowledge about the topic than them do, and then it will also be able to produce better words, sentences, paragraphs, etc.
But are most of those people not aware that AI can also produce misinformation about a particular thing? I believe one of the ways to even spot some AI-generated content in some places is how they can completely go rogue and produce what might not be helpful to an ongoing discussion, which if the AI user doesn’t have a clue about what’s happening, they might not be able to notice it and stupidly copy and paste it.