Badecker if you think I am going to spend the whole day looking in the mirror to check myself to see if theres anything after falling off or growing on overnight you are wasting your time. I am a prime example of an alpha male because my trophy wife lets me know this everyday (most days) and I have examined her many times to also to confirm that she is indeed a fine female (I was going to use term "fine feline" but then Badecker would insist she was a cat)


Any judge would look upon these forms of defence (apart from one particular one) as nothing more than a form of fillibuster and eventually lead to contempt if you continued after a ruling against you and any appeal along the same lines would simply be the definition of madness.


Why would you need to remain silent or not deny something if you are innocent? Simply deny you are guilty if you are innocent then there will not be sufficient grounds to either charge or convict you as there will be no evidence anyway and if evidence is fabricated or the justice system is corrupt through political interference or conflicts of interest then that is a corrupt enforcement and justice system that needs to be completely gutted anyway.

It would be better you brought about change through your elected representatives as these are the legislators and are responsible for making sure the judicial system is not corrupt however the main problem lies in the fact most politicans are corrupt so what do you expect the judicial system to be?

The greatest threat to any society is when both the enforcers and the judicial system are corrupted with bad actors whether by cops passing on information to their buddies or private investigators working on behalf of crooks whereby it should be a serious criminal offence to share data outside the course of an active investigation and even in the course of an investigation such shared data should have strict guidelines enforced by the correct checks and balances .......and legislators bringing about laws that are not conducive to a free democratic society whether it because of some radical ideaology they are attached to or corrupt lobbying practices.

Fighting the lawWinning in court simply requires you to be innocent of the said charge or if guilty (not wanting to enable criminals only people who simply fell foul of the law somehow)being in a position to demand leniency either through some form of psychological,medical or otherwise disadvantage etc or through some form of coercion having caused your doing such. Only facts count in court whether it is civil,commercial or criminal law so if your argument is based on pure facts that should be sufficient and if you have breached the law then you will be looking for leniency to the point of a satisfactory ruling or lenient as possible ruling against you.

In most civilised societies both the police force and judges use discretionary powers to ensure people who are not usually lawbreakers and acting out of character and who have a clean record, are non voilent and of good character .....DO get preferential treatment and this is CORRECT.

A person with no convictions should NOT be treated the same as a person with 100 convictions.


If you feel the need to have to use these arguments presented on those websites above then go for it if and when the time comes and see how you fare but like I said why would you need those arguments if you are innocent and if the system is unfair it needs changing NOT legal "hacks" to try to fight your case.

These "hacks" would only be suitable in avoiding a speeding ticket or parking fine in some cases but if you dodndidn't speed or park in someones disablility zone you really shouldn't need to try them. All you are really doing is making people feel empowered with a false sense of security or worse having some smart ass crook or serial nuisance waste court time at the tax payers expense in most cases where they get free legal representation.



Wise man, wise decision indeed. Proper Christian values brings the wisdom not to sit at the same table as scoffers lest you be devoured.

Badecker if you think I am going to spend the whole day looking in the mirror to check myself to see if theres anything after falling off or growing on overnight you are wasting your time. I am a prime example of an alpha male because my trophy wife lets me know this everyday (most days) and I have examined her many times to also to confirm that she is indeed a fine female (I was going to use term "fine feline" but then Badecker would insist she was a cat)


Any judge would look upon these forms of defence (apart from one particular one) as nothing more than a form of fillibuster and eventually lead to contempt if you continued after a ruling against you and any appeal along the same lines would simply be the definition of madness.


Why would you need to remain silent or not deny something if you are innocent? Simply deny you are guilty if you are innocent then there will not be sufficient grounds to either charge or convict you as there will be no evidence anyway and if evidence is fabricated or the justice system is corrupt through political interference or conflicts of interest then that is a corrupt enforcement and justice system that needs to be completely gutted anyway.

It would be better you brought about change through your elected representatives as these are the legislators and are responsible for making sure the judicial system is not corrupt however the main problem lies in the fact most politicans are corrupt so what do you expect the judicial system to be?

The greatest threat to any society is when both the enforcers and the judicial system are corrupted with bad actors whether by cops passing on information to their buddies or private investigators working on behalf of crooks whereby it should be a serious criminal offence to share data outside the course of an active investigation and even in the course of an investigation such shared data should have strict guidelines enforced by the correct checks and balances .......and legislators bringing about laws that are not conducive to a free democratic society whether it because of some radical ideaology they are attached to or corrupycorrupt lobbying practices.

Fighting the law in court simply requires you to be innocent of the said charge or if guilty (not wanting to enable criminals only people who simply fell foul of the law somehow)being in a position to demand leniency either through some form of psychological,medical or otherwise disadvantage etc or through some form of coercion having caused your doing such.

In most civilised societies both the police force and judges use discretionary powers to ensure people who are not usually lawbreakers and acting out of character and who have a clean record, are non voilent and of good character .....DO get preferential treatment and this is CORRECT.

A person with no convictions should NOT be treated the same as a person with 100 convictions.


If you feel the need to have to use these arguments presented on those websites above then go for it if and when the time comes and see how you fare but like I said why would you need those arguments if you are innocent and if the system is unfair it needs changing NOT legal "hacks" to try to fight your case.

These "hacks" would only be suitable in avoiding a speeding ticket or parking fine in some cases but if you dodn't speed or park in someones disablility zone you really shouldn't need to try them. All you are really doing is making people feel empowered with a false sense of security or worse having some smart ass crook or serial nuisance waste court time at the tax payers expense in most cases where they get free legal representation.

Quote from: Jet Cash on September 03, 2025, 08:14:46 AM

You guys are a bad influence on me, II try to keep out of political discussions, as I have traditional English Christian views.

Wise man, wise decision indeed. Proper Christian values brings the wisdom not to sit at the same table as scoffers lest you be devoured.

Badecker if you think I am going to spend the whole day looking in the mirror to check myself to see if theres anything after falling off or growing on overnight you are wasting your time. I am a prime example of an alpha male because my trophy wife lets me know this everyday (most days) and I have examined her many times to also to confirm that she is indeed a fine female (I was going to use term "fine feline" but then Badecker would insist she was a cat)


Any judge would look upon these forms of defence (apart from one particular one) as nothing more than a form of fillibuster and eventually lead to contempt if you continued after a ruling against you and any appeal along the same lines would simply be the definition of madness.


Why would you need to remain silent or not deny something if you are innocent? Simply deny you are guilty if you are innocent then there will not be sufficient grounds to either charge or convict you as there will be no evidence anyway and if evidence is fabricated or the justice system is corrupt through political interference or conflicts of interest then that is a corrupt enforcement and justice system that needs to be completely gutted anyway.

It would be better you brought about change through your elected representatives as these are the legislators and are responsible for making sure the judicial system is not corrupt however the main problem lies in the fact most politicans are corrupt so what do you expect the judicial system to be?

The greatest threat to any society is when both the enforcers and the judicial system are corrupted with bad actors whether by cops passing on information to their buddies or private investigators working on behalf of crooks whereby it should be a serious criminal offence to share data outside the course of an active investigation and even in the course of an investigation such shared data should have strict guidelines enforced by the correct checks and balances .......and legislators bringing about laws that are not conducive to a free democratic society whether it because of some radical ideaology they are attached to or corrupy lobbying practices.

Fighting the law in court simply requires you to be innocent of the said charge or if guilty (not wanting to enable criminals only people who simply fell foul of the law somehow)being in a position to demand leniency either through some form of psychological,medical or otherwise disadvantage etc or through some form of coercion having caused your doing such.

In most civilised societies both the police force and judges use discretionary powers to ensure people who are not usually lawbreakers and acting out of character and who have a clean record, are non voilent and of good character .....DO get preferential treatment and this is CORRECT.

A person with no convictions should NOT be treated the same as a person with 100 convictions.


If you feel the need to have to use these arguments presented on those websites above then go for it if and when the time comes and see how you fare but like I said why would you need those arguments if you are innocent and if the system is unfair it needs changing NOT legal "hacks" to try to fight your case.

These "hacks" would only be suitable in avoiding a speeding ticket or parking fine in some cases but if you dodn't speed or park in someones disablility zone you really shouldn't need to try them. All you are really doing is making people feel empowered with a false sense of security or worse having some smart ass crook or serial nuisance waste court time at the tax payers expense in most cases where they get free legal representation.