Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Hi guys,

I will lay out the following key findings for the bet placed by N8snathan on FC Poltava and Zorya Luhansk we have that lead us to believe that this bet is a fixed bet beyond any reasonable doubt.

Key Finding 1: N8snathan has bet fixed matches before

In October 2024, N8sathan specifically requested markets on Tomescu v Milojevic (ATP Challengers) - we didn't have this market listed due to integrity concerns raised by our provider. This was a red flag, but no bet was placed so we were lucky there.

In February 2025, N8sathan bet Albot Radu vs Kaylan Bigun. This was a fixed match, flagged by integrity services. As a result, his limits were pulled and we voided the bets. N8snathan acknowledged this at the time.

I have 650 bets on site and another 350 bets easily through manual bets. So a history of abusing the platform translates to 1 bet in a thousand and 1 bet I have not even placed? I was asked by David the origin of the specific shady pick, which I’ve provided promptly recently.

Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Key Finding 2: N8snathan has ties to match-fixing rings

After his limits were cut in February, N8snathan reached out offering information on other users that may be betting on fixes. He claimed to have this knowledge through a Russian match-fixing group that he was a part of, and proceeded to give information on users who I will not name for their privacy. These flags by him were correct.

As a result of his help, we wrongly assumed he would no longer be involved in these bets and increased his limits once more.

This is a lie, I’ve offered information on an account that was sold to a Ruski who needed accounts with limits, as I knew the account’s previous owner and they owed me money. Not sure how that has been twisted into me being part of this ring. I have never been to, nor speak a word of Russian.

Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Key Finding 3: Suspicious betting patterns

- N8snathan's bets immediately preceding this flagged bet ranged in size from $35 to $300. Out of nowhere, he increased his size drastically to $30,000.
- N8snathan has never bet on Ukrainian football, or any football that is not Tier-1; generally he bets on tennis, and occasionally Tier-1 football (EPL)

Not sure how betting $30,000 is suspicious when I’ve bet $100,000 per bet prior to this on multiple occasions and even $1,000,000 a few times. As for being an obscure market for me to bet on, I’ve bet on very obscure markets before too: from FIFA to Badminton to Chinese basketball.

Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Key Finding 4: The teams involved in this bet have been investigated by police for fixing matches before

https://www.espn.com.sg/soccer/story/_/id/37554992/match-fixing-raids-launched-champions-league-final-ukraine-police

An article from 7 years ago, with an investigation that led nowhere, is not the revelation that you think it is. You can find such articles about some of the biggest athletes too.

Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Key Finding 5: N8snathan failed to prove ownership of the wallet in which the funds were sent to Shuffle from

The funds received by N8snathan have never interacted with any wallets that are known as his. N8snathan had a discussion with our Head of Sports who requested he show video proof of ownership of the funds which were used to deposit in order to alleviate our match fixing concerns; N8snathan refused.

A lot of the time fixed matches are bet using other people/groups' funds, we correctly assumed that N8snathan would not be able to show ownership of the sending wallet as a result.

I refused? I provided the video proof to him as he requested, the moment he asked for it. I also offered to sign a message of his choice or send a transaction to an address of his choice from the address I deposited. This is a straight-up lie.
https://files.catbox.moe/kgibsz.jpg

Quote from: ndumm on Today at 12:31:21 AM

Key Note 3: We reached out to our provider to flag integrity concerns

We reached out to our provider flagging that we believed this match was fixed, they responded saying that they did not have proof to conclusively determine that the bet was a fixed market. In saying that, we remain firm in our stance that we believe that with everything we know about this user and the way that the bets were placed, we are confident that the user knew the result of this bet before placing it. Fixed matches happen more frequently than you would expect, and usually they don't get flagged by providers since they're getting more sophisticated in covering their tracks.

So it was a lie all along that the provider flagged the bet. The first thing I was told was the provider flagged the bet. But in fact, it was you guys flagging the bet yourselves, then asking the provider if there was suspicious activity. You are also stating that the provider cleared the bet of suspicion, and upon my own research, 2 other providers have cleared the bet of any suspicion as well. So somehow you claim your internal trading team is better than 3 different providers? And it was not Radar Integrity Services that flagged the bet as David claimed to me.
https://files.catbox.moe/kx1oyk.jpg