Apologies for the delay on this response, I have been doing some digging. There will be an update shortly that will close this case, proving that N8snathan knowingly bet on a fixed outcome and has been intentionally dragging our name through the mud here.
This excellent news. If you have anything of substance that proves the OP has made false and malicious accusations against you and Shuffle, his
forum account will be rendered useless
and your reputation will be restored. Having said that, at the moment it seems your counter-claim against the OP is flawed.
You have already changed your story from stating the sports provder raised the issue/flag with Shuffle to admitting
youryou blocked the OPs account first and then decided to contact the sports provider. Your version of events was already called in to question when the Stake owner
already stated the sports provider did not raise any flags/concerns with that particular situation.
As an aside, it has been an incredibly disappointing experience on this forum that a new account can come and sling a false sports scam accusation at us and within the span of 2 days, our entire brand on the forum has taken a hit.
I think you have to shoulder some responsibility
here. You have changed your version of events at least once and it does not look good on part of any business to do that.
Also, your first response in this thread was somewhat condescending because to post a counter-claim without any evidence (expecting others to simply accept your word) was another error.Also, your first response in this thread was somewhat condescending because to post a counter-claim without any evidence (expecting others to simply accept your word) was another error.
I know for a fact that you can buy the support of a 'DT' - I know this because since the flag has been raised, I have had multiple people reaching out offering to remove it for $10k or thereabouts. If that's all it takes to temporarily ruin the reputation of a platform that takes so much pride in being a safe place to play, then I don't think we want to continue being meaningfully involved in this forum.
Of those that have supported the flag, there are four that are on DT. If what you claim is true, either you have been contacted by one of them (highly unlikely) or you have been contacted by someone pertaining to be one of them (highly likely) using a similar member name.
I doubt this would have happened on the forum via PM, it might be something prevalent on Telegram. A screenshot will help shed light on the situation.
Those in the fixing world know that there are some fixed bets which are characterised as '100% clean', meaning that providers will not raise flags. N8snathan was told that this bet was 100% clean, which is why he's fighting it so hard and is obviously convinced we have no proof that it was a fix. Unfortunately for him, we do have proof. I'm deciding on the best way of getting that to you all.
Many of us are looking forward to studying the proof when you post it. Could you also provide an explanation why you were not truthful when you stated the sports provider alerted you to concern/flag when the reality is you blocked the OPs account without their request/advice/intervention.
I decided to refrain from supporting the flag and leaving negative feedback because for me it was important to get both sides of the story. If the Stake owner contradicted your version of events, I suppose that alongside the OPs claim would ordinarily meet the criteria to support the flag however I would prefer to understand the other side of the story before supporting the flag.
I am glad you are taking an active approach. If the OP has lied/cheated, I am sure the feedback against you will be removed and flag will be opposed. However, if you fail to materialise with credible verifiable evidence and as a result incur a number of negative feedback, you really will not be able to shift the blame elsewhere.