Quote from: slackovic on Today at 04:58:12 AM

I see. In that case I suggest we use the penalties questions as the tiebreaker. Do you agree cryptofrka and buwaytress?

Yep, agreed.

Quote from: Slissy on Today at 09:52:11 AM

The best thing is that cryptofrka won't escape rebuy this round😁😁😁

Already sent it, won't make this easy for you Grin

Now it's just a challenge who spends less before the final round, in which we all basically have similar chances of winning.

Quote from: hosemary on Today at 10:53:55 AM

Quote from: paco92x on Today at 10:48:12 AM

I was just looking at the results, and I’m not quite sure it’s true that he’s leading 5-4. He might have used the wrong format in his answer. He mentioned Sabalenka–Swiatek, but the question only asked for the winner, not both finalists. Maybe I’m wrong — we’ll see what the Mafia has to say about that.

You are right. I stand corrected.
HomieAllDay won't get any point from the tennis question and now you are tied at 4-4. As you truly said, the question asked the winner of women's side of the US open and HomieAllDay answered that with two players.
I didn't click on HomieAllDay's answer and I saw just the Sabalenka in his answer.

Well, a tricky one to be honest - and something that is not strictly in the rules. We will not count this answer, and I'll explain the reasoning.

As you know, we tend to accept 'logical' mistakes - for example, if you write 6 Yes-No options instead of 5, we will not void the whole answer, but simply reject the last pick.
If we ask for semifinalists and a finalist and you write just 'Sinner' and he wins, we'll still give you 2 points - because he has to play in the semifinal in order to play in the final. If he loses in the final, you'll still get 1 point for the same reason.

But in this case we were looking for the winner so, by following logic, can't accept the first answer that was written.