Next scheduled rescrape ... in 4 days
Version 1
Last scraped
Scraped on 07/09/2025, 07:48:35 UTC
Poor performances?
It may be a poor return for what was expected, but a security that was launched on July 29 for $90, which in just over a month, with little volatility as it is August, is trading at almost $98, I would not call a poor return. That return within the markets it is trying to compete with, such as coupon-paying bonds or stable companies that pay dividends, is huge, massive.
What I think Saylor wants to do is accelerate the arrival of the price at $100 because from there on, everything that goes up will be sold in STRC ATMs to replace MSTR ATMs.
It may be a poor return for what was expected, but a security that was launched on July 29 for $90, which in just over a month, with little volatility as it is August, is trading at almost $98, I would not call a poor return. That return within the markets it is trying to compete with, such as coupon-paying bonds or stable companies that pay dividends, is huge, massive.
What I think Saylor wants to do is accelerate the arrival of the price at $100 because from there on, everything that goes up will be sold in STRC ATMs to replace MSTR ATMs.
Exactly.
I mean poor performance is the fact that it didn’t reach 100, as this would be considered a “neutral” level that wouldn’t impact on the life cycle of the stock.
This quarter the performance wasn’t good, so Strategy raised their Dividend Yield target, that’s it.
and $7.8B is Fixed Income, i.e. a total of $19.2B.
Where the bulk of the Fixed Income $7.8B, i.e. $2.52B, came from STRC. And when STRC launched in the market, its price was $90 but it is currently trading at $98. That is, the price has increased by about 9% in a month, which is not negligible at all. Yes, we might have expected better performance from STRC, as you said, $100, but it has not yet touched this price. For which we might call it bad performance. But in reality, it is not bad performance at all. I think Michael Saylor is working on this and he probably wants it to hit $100 because as Free Market Capitalist said, if it goes above $100, STRC can be sold off and used in place of MSTR ATMs, STRC ATMs. I think that will allow the company to raise funds to buy more.
Picture Source:
Original archived Re: MicroStrategy Buys $250M in Bitcoin, Calling the Crypto ‘Superior to Cash’
Scraped on 07/09/2025, 07:43:22 UTC
Poor performances?
It may be a poor return for what was expected, but a security that was launched on July 29 for $90, which in just over a month, with little volatility as it is August, is trading at almost $98, I would not call a poor return. That return within the markets it is trying to compete with, such as coupon-paying bonds or stable companies that pay dividends, is huge, massive.
What I think Saylor wants to do is accelerate the arrival of the price at $100 because from there on, everything that goes up will be sold in STRC ATMs to replace MSTR ATMs.
It may be a poor return for what was expected, but a security that was launched on July 29 for $90, which in just over a month, with little volatility as it is August, is trading at almost $98, I would not call a poor return. That return within the markets it is trying to compete with, such as coupon-paying bonds or stable companies that pay dividends, is huge, massive.
What I think Saylor wants to do is accelerate the arrival of the price at $100 because from there on, everything that goes up will be sold in STRC ATMs to replace MSTR ATMs.
Exactly.
I mean poor performance is the fact that it didn’t reach 100, as this would be considered a “neutral” level that wouldn’t impact on the life cycle of the stock.
This quarter the performance wasn’t good, so Strategy raised their Dividend Yield target, that’s it.
and $7.8B is Fixed Income, i.e. a total of $19.2B.
Where the bulk of the Fixed Income $7.8B, i.e. $2.52B, came from STRC. And when STRC launched in the market, its price was $90 but it is currently trading at $98. That is, the price has increased by about 9% in a month, which is not negligible at all. Yes, we might have expected better performance from STRC, as you said, $100, but it has not yet touched this price. For which we might call it bad performance. But in reality, it is not bad performance at all. I think Michael Saylor is working on this and he probably wants it to hit $100 because as Free Market Capitalist said, if it goes above $100, STRC can be sold off and used in place of MSTR ATMs, STRC ATMs. I think that will allow the company to raise funds to buy more.
Picture Source: Strategy Twitter post