Quote from: Agbamoni on September 07, 2025, 05:38:29 PM

Quote from: wakier on September 07, 2025, 11:32:53 AM

Quote from: shinratensei_ on September 06, 2025, 05:02:39 PM

This is a good move for Man United, as he can't be expected to replace De Gea. It's only right that Man United let him go if they want to make a change for the better, as Man United problem lies in their weak defense. Furthermore, even if he stays at Man United, the club won't necessarily use him, as Man United have already signed a new goalkeeper this summer, so competition for places is quite fierce.

Lol, Manchester United have been open to let him go the moment they got a replacement for him. The club dont want him anymore, the coach dont think Onana will ever improve in the team. It's a clarification that they team has all lost hope on him, its up to him to face a new chapter in his career.

Manchester United should also be aware they have not found that good goalkeeper yet. Until their new GK is tested and proving, they shouldn't be so happy at relieving Onana from their squad.

Manchester United had a different plan with Onana but I have not seen such a good performance from this goalkeeper since he came to Manchester United, so it is natural for the club not to plan for him. A goalkeeper plays an important role in a team, a goalkeeper does not only protect a goalpost but also tells the players from which position to which position or which player of the opposing team can attack, but the goalkeeper tells the players on the field. Onana is not active in this way and he cannot resist counter attacks well, maybe that is why Manchester United was forced to make such a decision against him. Yes, it cannot be done in such a hurry until Manchester United finds an alternative goalkeeper for this goalkeeper. If they release this goalkeeper before they can find a good one, they will be in even greater danger.