Quote from: Slow death on Today at 08:32:46 PM

I see that if a company is profitable and also thinks about seeing people mentally healthy, then taking measures that enable a reduction in cases of addiction is always very welcome. I just hope that the company is really being serious and not just making statements in the press to gain people's attention while behind the scenes they make other decisions. Because I've seen many cases where companies pose in the media as companies that want the well-being of people while behind the scenes they are acting badly.

We can't avoid such tactics by the companies because like it or not, most of them are after for their profits of their business. Hence, they may be building their image from the eyes of the public but behind the curtain, they are trying to exhaust their profits from the people as much as they can. So it is up to the public how they will act on their activities.

Quote from: Findingnemo on Today at 08:07:19 PM

No sensible person will lend money for gambling and the same logic he applied in this case because if he allowed pay later option then people will just use it and if they lost then they will just close their account and the compnay will just deal with the defaults so he is making the right move by saying no. And there is nothing to debate about this even some countries and their banks have rules like they are not allowing their cards for gambling deposits and this is no different from it.

As we have seen, most banks don't really allow deposits known to come from gambling sources. Even in online banking, some exchanges are not accepting deposits from gambling sites. They have their prerogative not to accept because they have their own set of rules when it comes to deposits and withdrawals.