Quote from: maarx on May 06, 2014, 05:53:06 PM

Quote from: IconicExpert on May 06, 2014, 05:50:22 PM

Quote from: blade87 on May 06, 2014, 05:45:21 PM

Quote from: IconicExpert on May 06, 2014, 05:34:53 PM

Now let me ask you a question...if a person has a history of telling the truth, why would that person fuck up his reputation for a "crazy story"?

Yeah. Just like when you flat out lied in big bold letters saying how a big price drop was caused by a Mintpal. You don't even know how to properly stretch the truth.

Quote

I never said they don't pump. They pump all the time and then dump again. I said they don't want the price to skyrocket from major news. That "Sell Mint" campaign would not have made the price sky rocket.

You may be a "businessman" but you are certainly not a market trader and/or market analyst. Time and time again you have proven to me that you have no clue how the market is driven by (mathematical) technicals in the short term, and by news in the long term. The sell Mint campaign wouldn't have made the price rocket, much like the announcement of your WS campaign didn't do anything to BC's price - it still kept trending down. It was around the time of the PR news that the market technicals began showing reversal. That news just happen to come a good time. And we had a nice like rise after the news until you came along. But I won't blame you on that one, because unlike you, I've already been expecting some sideways movement regardless of news. You on the other hand would just simply blame everyone else around you (as you always have been) for (your) undesirable market movement.

Did you read what I wrote? That "Sell Mint" campaign would not have made the price sky rocket.

How is this a reply to what blade wrote?

Underlined *

may i add that i never suggested that the announcement itself would have done much.
I said it would have resulted in a pump if the mint bagholders actually followed it.