Ninjastic
PostEdited versionsQuotes to this post
Next scheduled rescrape ... in 5 days
Version 1
Last scraped
Edited on 11/09/2025, 17:55:35 UTC
Quote from: Agbamoni on September 11, 2025, 02:39:47 PM
Quote from: franky1 on September 11, 2025, 12:20:58 PM
i know some lobbyists are probably going to want to turn all universities into prison walled institutions, all bags checked all identities shown and camera's on every foot of the campus, trying to push for security overreach, and reduce peoples freedoms of movements (probably snipers ulterior motives)
..
the university does have multiple camera's and the sniper wasnt using a handgun, so shouldnt be hard to review security camera's to see whom was carrying a large object into the building the sniper used. and then trace from camera to camera the path taken back to some vehicle or location to identify the culprit, it just will take time to investigate/review

this was not some situation of 1960's grassy knoll. it was ontop a building in the middle of campus with lots of angles of cameras

The FBI has reported that the shooter was wearing an all dark outfit. I think the camera has spotted him running on top of the building after the shooting.
It wont be hard to identify the shooter, if they review the video of people fleeing the scene after hearing the gunshot. Of course the shooter isn't some teleporter. He would come down the building mix in the crowd and flee.

Well, I dont know if the shooter fled without the gun or perhaps he took the gun and fled. Anyway, just like you said, the cameras of course would have captured every person coming into the premises and would easily identify someone carrying a big object into the building. Another thing to consider is, what if the shooter has been in the building even before the conference started. Everything was well planned.
...

More digging will be done..

update: the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun wearing blue denim jeans, a footprintblack hoody with chest image* and a palm printblack hat and are forensically looking into thoseshades

the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun, a footprint and a palm print and are forensically looking into those

*eagle infront flag "land of the free home of the brave"

opinion:
its beleived from the images prior to assassination, the suspect did not arrive carrying the weapon in the photos, so suggestion is that it was well planned prior to the incident, by hiding the weapon on campus way before incident. the picture also shows the suspect clasping his hands in clenched fists to avoid touching the hand rail of stairs, etc, using only the sleeve of black hoody to press covered wrist against hand rail to stable himself as he walked up stairs, again shows intent to avoid leaving behind dna trace forensics, which shows more intent to want to follow through with act without getting caught.

Original archived Re: Charlie Kirk shot dead
Scraped on 11/09/2025, 17:24:58 UTC
Quote from: Agbamoni on September 11, 2025, 02:39:47 PM
Quote from: franky1 on September 11, 2025, 12:20:58 PM
i know some lobbyists are probably going to want to turn all universities into prison walled institutions, all bags checked all identities shown and camera's on every foot of the campus, trying to push for security overreach, and reduce peoples freedoms of movements (probably snipers ulterior motives)
..
the university does have multiple camera's and the sniper wasnt using a handgun, so shouldnt be hard to review security camera's to see whom was carrying a large object into the building the sniper used. and then trace from camera to camera the path taken back to some vehicle or location to identify the culprit, it just will take time to investigate/review

this was not some situation of 1960's grassy knoll. it was ontop a building in the middle of campus with lots of angles of cameras

The FBI has reported that the shooter was wearing an all dark outfit. I think the camera has spotted him running on top of the building after the shooting.
It wont be hard to identify the shooter, if they review the video of people fleeing the scene after hearing the gunshot. Of course the shooter isn't some teleporter. He would come down the building mix in the crowd and flee.

Well, I dont know if the shooter fled without the gun or perhaps he took the gun and fled. Anyway, just like you said, the cameras of course would have captured every person coming into the premises and would easily identify someone carrying a big object into the building. Another thing to consider is, what if the shooter has been in the building even before the conference started. Everything was well planned.
...

More digging will be done..

update: the FBI have followed a figure of such description from the building to a wooded area off campus.. where he dumped his weapon. so they have reviewed and traced his exit off campus. they are now viewing other footage before the assassination to trace that path backwards and then they will be be looking at further ways to trace him off campus after the assassination. they have a picture of "a person of interest" but not identified the name yet. they have the gun, a footprint and a palm print and are forensically looking into those