If a person can't even control themselves, how can they expect it is other's duties to do so better than they can themselves?
This is a direct and indirect response to the post you quoted. I think, not to judge the other guy, those who do self-exclusion and go back to the same casino to gamble, do it because they know that they can blame their financial loss which would later happen on the casino and want to make them look bad. No casino is perfect but as an individual you have to ensure you are disciplined enough to control yourself and ask for help from someone that can hold you accountable if you think you can't.
With all due respect, your statement is a complete and dangerous misunderstanding of what a responsible gambling policy is for.
The purpose of a self-exclusion is not to help a person find "discipline." It is to prevent a vulnerable player from being able to gamble, period. I explicitly told yourrazed team I needed to "step out a while" because of my gambling issue.You claim I am just trying to "make you look bad." The truth is, your own system is doing that. It allowed me to create and successfully verify a second account with the exact same personal details. This is not only a failure of my self-control;
it's a monumental failure of razed security and responsible gambling protocols.
My loss is a direct result of Razed's negligence. The evidence from my chats with razed shows that they were fully aware of my situation and failed to act.