Original archived Re: [ANN] CHAMBY: serious memcoin on TON
Scraped on 02/10/2025, 17:06:30 UTC
Typically, if a whale is inactive and isn't buying more tokens, it's likely waiting for a good price to exit. However, Chamby's price can't grow rapidly while there are inactive, disillusioned whales in the ecosystem who will hinder growth. It's better that these whales are exiting now, at low prices, than they will do later, at high prices.
I think that whales in all projects are a variable, so to speak. Definitely not a constant. They cannot be the same holders who were there from the very beginning. Today, one group of people may be the whales, and tomorrow it could be another, since tokens move from one holder to another. This is normal, and such transfers also help strengthen the ecosystem.
Well, we definitely haven't seen any new whales appearing yet. Their numbers are only decreasing. Maybe that's a good thing in a way. The fewer disappointed or dishonest freeloaders there are, the better. It will be easier for Chamby to grow. Overall, most of the Russian whales have gone away. Only a small number remain.
It is not even good for a project to have so many whales because if those whales decide to sell their tokens one day, it can cause the price of the token to dump hard and lead to sell pressure among investors, and if the project isn't strong enough, it won't survive it. It is pleasing that the number of whales in Chamby token is slowly reducing because it will help to stabilise the price of Chamby token, which will aid the price of Chamby token to increase gradually. It would be better if all whales could sell their Chamby tokens so that no investor could have the power to manipulate the Chamby token price anymore.
On the contrary, the fewer whales there are and the larger they are, the stronger their influence on the price.