What do you think? Is betting on the “rig side” actually an effective strategy, or just an excuse when people lose using stats?
Finding games that are fixed is not an easy something, if you are lucky to find it this week you might end up not finding it again for a long time on your own because it's not always easy to detect fixed matches, unless you have an insider information.
The claims of match fixing are not an excuse from people who lose when stats fails them, it is actually a real something that is happening. I will say relying on fixed matches it is an effective strategy if you have a direct link to an insider information because not many are privileged to this information. But if your source is not from an insider, it's better to rely on your stats in finding winnings on your own because you might end up losing money to scammers claiming to have fixed games and lose at the casino at same time.
Yea I was going to ask that - how does anyone know what games/matches are
fixed before they take place? I hear
calls about fixed matches after they are played but
how do you know beforehand
, how do you prove afterwards too?
Personally I think its impossible to know this, its out of our control so I dont think
about it and it doesnt bother me
. even when i'm betting I never ask myself "this
match could be rigged"